Cited by 165Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsHealth, psychology, and well-beingHealth and Well-being Studies

Stress on health-related quality of life in older adults: the protective nature of mindfulness

Open access
de Frias, Cindy M., Whyne, Erum·2015·Aging & Mental Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The current study examined whether the link between stress and health-related quality of life was buffered by protective factors, namely mindfulness, in a sample of middle-aged and older adults. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 134 healthy, community-dwelling adults (ages 50-85 years) were recruited from Dallas, TX. The participants were screened for depressive symptoms and severity (using the Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9]). All participants completed measures of self-reported health status (i.e. SF36v2: mental and physical health composites), life stress (using the Elders Life Stress Inventory [ELSI]), and trait mindfulness (i.e. Mindful Attention Awareness Scale). RESULTS: Hierarchical regressions (covarying for age, gender, and education) showed that life stress was inversely related to physical and mental health. Mindfulness was positively related to mental health. The negative effect of life stress on mental health was weakened for those individuals with higher levels of trait mindfulness. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that mindfulness is a powerful, adaptive strategy that may protect middle-aged and older adults from the well-known harmful effects of stress on mental health.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13607863.2014.924090

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 165

Authors
de Frias, C. M., & Whyne, E.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Dallas (US)
Venue
Aging & Mental Health
Published
2014-06-18
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
201-206
ISSN
  • 1360-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-6915
OpenAlex
W2089412759
Cited by
165
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 7
FWCI
8.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Aging & Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Fonds pour la Formation à la Recherche dans l’Industrie et dans l’Agriculture
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, psychology, and well-being
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Health and Well-being Studies
Keywords
mindfulness, life events, health-related quality of life, older adults, middle-aged adults, mental health, physical health, protective factors, buffering effect, depressive symptoms, stress buffering
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Stress, Psychological, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review