Cited by 71Health disparities and outcomesAging, Health, and DisabilityAging and Gerontology Research

Is the association between social network types, depressive symptoms and life satisfaction mediated by the perceived availability of social support? A cross-sectional analysis using the Canadian longitudinal study on aging

Harasemiw, Oksana, Newall, Nancy, Mackenzie, Corey S., Shooshtari, Shahin, Menec, Verena·2019·Aging & Mental Health

Abstract

Objectives: The objectives of this study were to examine: 1) whether the relationship between social network types, depressive symptoms and life satisfaction is mediated by different types of perceived social support; and, 2) whether social support plays a mediational role for married versus unmarried older adults.Methods: The study was based on national, baseline data (Tracking Cohort) from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging for participants aged 65 to 85 (N = 8782). Five social network types derived from cluster analysis were used as predictors in the mediation analyses, with the four social support subscales of the Medical Outcomes Survey (MOS) Social Support Survey (tangible, emotional, positive social interactions, and affectionate) included as mediators, and depressive symptoms and life satisfaction as outcome variables. Socio-demographic and physical health variables were included as covariates.Results: Significant indirect effects emerged, with less diverse social network structures generally associated with less social support which, in turn, was related to more depressive symptoms and lower life satisfaction. However, different findings emerged for different types of social support, for participants who were married and unmarried, and for depressive symptoms versus life satisfaction.Conclusion: Our findings suggest that restricted social networks that are reflective of social isolation, as well as those that are intermediate in terms of their diversity can create gaps in perceived social support and, consequently, can negatively impact mental health and life satisfaction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13607863.2018.1495176

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 52 · Cited by 71

Authors
Harasemiw, O., Newall, N., Mackenzie, C. S., Shooshtari, S., & Menec, V.
Affiliations
  • University of Manitoba (CA)
  • Brandon University (CA)
Corresponding author
Menec, Verena
Venue
Aging & Mental Health
Published
2018-11-08
Volume
23
Issue
10
Pages
1413-1422
ISSN
  • 1360-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-6915
OpenAlex
W2899608444
Cited by
71
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3
FWCI
5.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Aging & Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (LSA 9447)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
social network types, depressive symptoms, life satisfaction, perceived social support, mediation, older adults, marital status, social isolation, social network diversity, mental health, Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Canada, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Marriage, Personal Satisfaction, Social Support, Social Networking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review