Cited by 23Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychometric Methodologies and TestingAging and Gerontology Research

Factorial validity and invariance analysis of the five items version of Mindful Awareness Attention Scale in older adults

Caycho-Rodríguez, Tomás, Tomás, José M., Ventura- León, José, Carranza Esteban, Renzo Felipe, Oblitas Guadalupe, Luís A., Reyes-Bossio, Mario, García Cadena, Cirilo H., Cabrera-Orosco, Isabel·2021·Aging & Mental Health

Abstract

Objective: Mindfulness or the full attention state is a factor that contributes to the successful process of aging. This study aims to evaluate the evidence of validity, on the basis of the internal structure, convergent and discriminant validity, reliability and factorial invariance across gender, for the five items Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS-5) within a sample of older adults. Methods : The participants were 323 Peruvian older adults, consisting of 160 women and 163 men, whose average ages were 68.58 (S. D = 7.23) and 68.91 years (S. D = 7.12), respectively. In addition to the MAAS-5, the Satisfaction with Life Scale and the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 were administered. Results: The Confirmatory Factor Analysis indicates that the one-factor structure of the MAAS-5 presents adequate fit for the total sample (χ 2 = 11.24, df = 5, χ 2 /df = 2.25, CFI = .99, RMSEA = .06 [90%CI: .01, .11]; and SRMR = .025), as well as for the sub-samples of men and women. This one-factor solution presents adequate internal consistency (ω = 80 [95%CI: .76 - .82]) and it is invariant across gender. Regarding convergent validity, high scores in the MAAS are associated with a greater satisfaction with life ( r = .88, p r = -.56, p Conclusions: The preliminary results back the use of the MAAS-5 as a self-report measure of mindfulness that has an adequate unifactorial structure that is reliable and invariant across gender for measuring the full attention state in elderly Peruvians.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13607863.2020.1716685

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 103 · Cited by 23

Authors
Caycho-Rodríguez, T., Tomás, J. M., Ventura- León, J., Carranza Esteban, R. F., Oblitas Guadalupe, L. A., Reyes-Bossio, M., García Cadena, C. H., & Cabrera-Orosco, I.
Affiliations
  • Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Privada del Norte
  • Universitat de València (ES)
  • Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Perú
  • Carrera de Psicología, Universidad Autónoma del Perú
  • Peruvian University of Applied Sciences (PE)
  • Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León
  • Universidad Continental (PE)
Venue
Aging & Mental Health
Published
2020-01-23
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
756-765
ISSN
  • 1360-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-6915
OpenAlex
W3001934601
Cited by
23
References
103
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Aging & Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UPNBox (Universidad Privada del Norte) (submittedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
Mindful Attention Awareness Scale, mindfulness, older adults, measurement invariance, gender invariance, convergent validity, discriminant validity, reliability statistics, life satisfaction, depression
MeSH terms
Aged, Attention, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review