Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 7Narrative Theory and AnalysisCinema History and CriticismCultural Insights and Digital Impacts

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

“The road not taken”: an interactive film between narrative and database

Maziarczyk, Grzegorz·2023·New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia
DOI 10.1080/13614568.2023.2214516
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article discusses the impact of the interplay between narrativity and database logic on the interactor’s engagement with interactive digital films. It explores their co-deployment in three recently released works—Late Shift, Black Mirror: Bandersnatch and Her Story—within a theoretical framework extending Hartmut Koenitz’s model of interactive digital narrative. Late Shift and Bandersnatch expose the interactor to relentless narrative progression, as he/she is to decide what action the protagonist should take at various junctures in the plot, culled from the database of multiple potential storylines. By contrast, in Her Story database becomes the surface structure the interactor gains access to: his/her task is to solve the case of a missing man by searching through fragmented video clips from police interviews with his wife. This dominance of database logic paradoxically enhances narrativity by provoking the interactor’s hermeneutic desire, while narrative agency Late Shift seemingly ascribes to him/her may attenuate his/her immersion due to its being limited to the choices presupposed within its database structure. Bandersnatch dodges this problem through self-reflexive, performative thematisation of illusory agency, which ties in with the disclosure of the tension between narrative and database as its organisational principle.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13614568.2023.2214516

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Hussey J., 2017, Paradoxa, 29, 169
  2. Kolhoff L., 2019, Interactive storytelling. ICIDS 2019, 73

Cited by

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Maziarczyk, G.
Affiliations
John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin (PL)
Corresponding author
Maziarczyk, Grzegorz
ORCID
Maziarczyk, Grzegorz
Venue
New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2023-01-02
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
56-71
ISSN
  • 0955-8543 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-4568
  • 1740-7842
DOI
10.1080/13614568.2023.2214516
OpenAlex
W4378230763
Semantic Scholar
ca123e54fb4192bd4c5980b53d92a0da7d46d730
Cited by
6
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
FWCI
16.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Narrative Theory and Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Cinema History and Criticism
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Cultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Keywords
interactive film, narrativity, interactive digital narratives, Black Mirror: Bandersnatch, Her Story, narrative agency, immersion, self-reflexivity, branching narratives

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.