Cited by 27Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesSchool Leadership and Teacher PerformanceEducation and Teacher Training

Middle leaders’ facilitation of teacher learning in collaborative teams

Open access
Lipscombe, Kylie, Buckley-Walker, Kellie, Tindall-Ford, Sharon·2023·School Leadership & Management

Abstract

There is an increased focus on schools and school systems to develop teaching teams to improve school teaching and learning practices. As such, effectual school leadership has become synonymous with creating the conditions for teachers to work collaboratively to improve school teaching and learning. Middle leaders, teachers who are formally appointed to a leadership role, operate between senior leaders and teachers, are often responsible for leading teacher teams and facilitating the communicative space so that collaboration leads to positive outcomes for teacher practice and student learning. However, there is a lack of conceptual understanding of the micro-processes middle leaders enact when facilitating teacher teams and how facilitation impacts new or different teaching and collaborative practices. Drawing on the theory of practice architecture, we interrogate data from interviews, observations, and artefacts in three case study schools in Australia, to understand facilitation through the modes of action (doings), forms of understandings (sayings), and ways in which participants relate to one another and the world (relatings). Analysis of data revealed middle leader facilitation is consequential to how teacher team operate and that six ecologies of facilitation practices are typically enacted by middle leaders: procedural management, regulating interactions, expert guidance, purposeful dialogue, decision-making, and social-emotional support.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13632434.2023.2215803

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 46 · Cited by 27

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Koh, H., D. Guru, L. Drysdale, and L. L. Ang. 2011. "How School Leaders Perceive the Leadership Role of Middle Leaders in Singapore Primary Schools." Asia Pacific Education Review 12 (4): 609-620. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2019.101530. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Teitel, L. 2014. "Teachers at the Center of Improvement: School-Based Instructional Rounds in a Connecticut District Engages Teachers as Classroom Observers, Leading to Instructional Adjustments." School Administrator 71 (1): 35-39.

Authors
Lipscombe, K., Buckley-Walker, K., & Tindall-Ford, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Wollongong (AU)
  • School of Education, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
Corresponding author
Lipscombe, Kylie
Venue
School Leadership & Management
Published
2023-05-27
Volume
43
Issue
3
Pages
301-321
ISSN
  • 1363-2434 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-2626
OpenAlex
W4383340581
Cited by
27
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1
FWCI
20.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • School Leadership and Management (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Leadership and Teacher Performance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Teacher Training
Keywords
middle leaders, teacher learning, cooperative groups, facilitation, practice architectures, school leadership, teacher teams, expert guidance, socioemotional support, decision-making, procedural management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review