Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 160

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Comparison between icosahedral, decahedral and crystalline Lennard-Jones models containing 500 to 6000 atoms

Raoult, B., Farges, J., De Feraudy, M. F., Torchet, G.·1989·Philosophical Magazine B

Abstract

This paper presents a number of models made of soft spheres freely relaxed through the Lennard-Jones potential, in the size range 500 < N < 6000 atoms. The external shape and potential energy of several icosahedral, decahedral and crystalline models are reported. Starting from the macroscopic approach of particle stability, the facetting of surface models, never considered in previous relaxation calculations, is introduced as a basic point in this study. Results confirm the stability of the icosahedral structure in small-size models and that of the f.c.c. structure in large-size models. In this connection the results prove that twinned f.c.c. models are more stable than f.c.c. polyhedra. They also establish the stability of the decahedral structure in a large size range, 1600 < N < 105 atoms. Comparisons with macroscopic results on the stability of metal particles are presented and application to argon clusters is discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13642818908209749

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 160

Metadata

Authors
Raoult, B., Farges, J., De Feraudy, M. F., & Torchet, G.
Venue
Philosophical Magazine B
Published
1989-12
Volume
60
Issue
6
Pages
881-906
ISSN
  • 0141-8637 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-2812
  • 1463-6417
OpenAlex
W1978614837
Cited by
160
References
0
FWCI
5.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison between icosahedral, decahedral and crystalline Lennard-Jones models containing 500 to 6000 atoms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13642818908209749
The paper
Raoult, B., Farges, J., De Feraudy, M. F., & Torchet, G. (1989). Comparison between icosahedral, decahedral and crystalline Lennard-Jones models containing 500 to 6000 atoms. Philosophical Magazine B. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642818908209749

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.