The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Computer software and qualitative analysis: Trends, issues and resources
Abstract
Developments during the 1990s in the use of computer software for qualitative data analysis are surveyed. Salient trends are identified as are wider issues associated with software use. Also listed are some of the resources now available to potential and actual users of computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software (CAQDAS).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“While these simpler approaches can be used to develop a code list, they do not have the sophisticated functionality of many CAQDAS that allow linking between codes, visualizing of codes, developing sub-codes, writing memos, and linking those memos. 32,33”
From Research and scholarly methods: Thematic analysis (2023) · cites this paper as [33]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Using natural language processing technology for qualitative data analysis
Crowston, K., Allen, E. E., & Heckman, R. (2011) · International Journal of Social Research Methodology · doi:10.1080/13645579.2011.625764 · Cited by 169
Researcher reflexivity: exploring the impacts of CAQDAS use
Woods, M., Macklin, R., & Lewis, G. K. (2016) · International Journal of Social Research Methodology · doi:10.1080/13645579.2015.1023964 · Cited by 113
Atherton, A., & Elsmore, P. (2007) · Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/17465640710749117 · Cited by 80
Research and scholarly methods: Thematic analysis
Cernasev, A., & Axon, D. R. (2023) · JACCP: Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy · doi:10.1002/jac5.1817 · Cited by 71
Food safety practices and managers' perceptions: a qualitative study in hospitality
Arendt, S. W., Páez, P., & Strohbehn, C. H. (2013) · International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management · doi:10.1108/09596111311290255 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, R. M., & Esterhuizen, L.
- ORCID
- Lee, Raymond M.
- Venue
- International Journal of Social Research Methodology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 231-243
- ISSN
- 1364-5579 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5300
- OpenAlex
- W2036591202
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Social Research Methodology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Data Analysis and Archiving
- Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
- Keywords
- computer-assisted qualitative analysis, qualitative data analysis software, software trends, software resources, qualitative research methodology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
