Cited by 46Educational Research and MethodsQualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsBusiness Strategies and Management Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

Aligning theory and methodology in mixed methods research: Before Design Theoretical Placement

Open access
Alavi, Mousa, Archibald, Mandy, McMaster, Rose, Lopez, Violeta, Cleary, Michelle·2018·International Journal of Social Research Methodology

Abstract

When a theoretical framework (and its components) is not clearly linked to research methods, researchers risk designing flawed studies, wherein the stated research question is inconsistent with the research design. Explicitly identifying one’s theoretical orientation can provide an orderly schematic for linking observations from separate investigations (i.e. qualitative, quantitative) thereby facilitating understandings and guiding research designs particularly in fields of social and health sciences where complex phenomena are an aspect of the subject of inquiry. Although this has been established, how researchers might position their research theoretically to guide mixed methods research is less clear. In this paper, we propose the Before Design Theoretical Placement as a general guide for specifying and locating studies in a broader theoretical grounding, and discuss how it may inform overall study considerations. We then use this approach to illustrate how theories and methods can work together to facilitate professional knowledge development from a relational perspective.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13645579.2018.1435016

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 77 · Cited by 46

Research works printed but not linked: 66

  1. 10.1017/S0003055401003100 · DOI
  2. Alavi M., 2011, Investigating the Indicators of nursing students’ clinical competency: Clinical nursing teachers viewpoints in Isfahan university of medical sciences (Unpublished report)
  3. 10.3109/13561820.2011.623803 · DOI
  4. 10.1177/160940691501400205 · DOI
  5. 10.1177/1558689811416481 · DOI
  6. 10.4135/9780857024329 · DOI
  7. 10.2307/2088165 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Boateng R., 2014, Research made easy
  9. 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135239 · DOI
  10. 10.1037/a0024448 · DOI
  11. Byrne B. M., 2010, Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming
  12. 10.3109/01612840.2010.547655 · DOI
  13. Creswell J. W., 2003, Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches
  14. Creswell J. W., 2014, Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches
  15. Creswell, J. W., Klassen, A. C. & Smith, K. C. (2011).Bestpractices for mixed methods research in the health sciences(pp. 2094–2103). Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health.
  16. Creswell J. W., 2011, Designing and conducting mixed methods research
  17. Creswell J. W., 2003, Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research, 209
  18. 10.1037/h0040957 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Curry L., 2014, Mixed methods in health sciences research: A practical primer
  20. De Lisle J., 2011, Caribbean Curriculum, 18, 87
  21. 10.1177/1558689808316807 · DOI
  22. Denzin N. K., 2005, The SAGE handbook of qualitative research
  23. 10.1177/1558689811412972 · DOI
  24. 10.5897/MPR.2013.0107 · DOI
  25. 10.1177/1558689815581222 · DOI
  26. 10.1177/1558689815594687 · DOI
  27. Garner M., 2009, Teaching research in the social sciences
  28. Glaser B. G., 1967, The discovery grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative inquiry
  29. 10.1177/1558689812461179 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Hesse-Biber S. N., 2010, Mixed methods research: Merging theory with practice
  31. 10.1177/1049732315580558 · DOI
  32. 10.1177/1558689813483987 · DOI
  33. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199933624.001.0001 · DOI
  34. 10.1002/9781118490013.ch2 · DOI
  35. Irajpour A., 2009, Investigating the structure of IPC in the Iranian mental health services (Unpublished report)
  36. Irajpour A., 2012, Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research, 17, S171
  37. 10.1177/1558689806298224 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1111/jpm.2011.18.issue-6 · DOI
  39. Kline R. B., 2011, Principles and practice of structural equation modeling
  40. 10.1037/1045-3830.22.4.557 · DOI
  41. Leedy P. D., 2016, Practice research: Planning and delivering
  42. Llahana S. V., 2005, A Theoretical framework for clinical specialist nursing: An example from diabetes
  43. 10.1177/1558689811427912 · DOI
  44. McKenna H., 2006, Nursing theories and models, 10.4324/9780203135440 · DOI
  45. 10.1177/1558689811418095 · DOI
  46. 10.1177/2345678906292462 · DOI
  47. Morse J. M, 1994, Handbook of qualitative inquiry, 220
  48. Morse J. M., 2012, Qualitative health research: Creating a new discipline
  49. Nevid J., 2012, Essentials of psychology: Concepts and applications
  50. Newman I., 2013, Mid-Western educational researcher, 25, 31
  51. 10.1080/13645570500402447 · DOI
  52. Onwuegbuzie A. J., 2012, The Qualitative Report, 17, 1
  53. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.10.005 · DOI
  54. 10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0102 · DOI
  55. Patton M. Q., 2001, Qualitative evaluation and research methods
  56. Patton M., 2002, Qualitative research and evaluation methods
  57. Patton M. Q., 2005, Qualitative Research. Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science
  58. Polit D. F., 2014, Essentials of nursing research: Appraising evidence for nursing practice
  59. 10.1002/(ISSN)1098-240X · DOI
  60. Silverman D., 2013, Doing qualitative research
  61. Sokolowski J. A., 2012, Modeling and simulation in the medical and health sciences
  62. Tavallaei M., 2010, The Journal of International Social Research, 3, 570
  63. Teddlie C., 2009, Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences
  64. 10.1207/s15327752jpa8701_03 · DOI
  65. UNESCO, 2015, Agree to differ
  66. Walker L. O., 2005, Strategies for theory construction in nursing: Pearson new international edition

Metadata

Authors
Alavi, M., Archibald, M., McMaster, R., Lopez, V., & Cleary, M.
Affiliations
  • Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (IR)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • University of Tasmania (AU)
  • Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
Corresponding author
Alavi, Mousa
Venue
International Journal of Social Research Methodology
Published
2018-02-11
Volume
21
Issue
5
Pages
527-540
ISSN
  • 1364-5579 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5300
OpenAlex
W2786244774
Cited by
46
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5
FWCI
13.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • International Journal of Social Research Methodology (publishedVersion)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
  • UTAS Research Repository (submittedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Management Research
Keywords
mixed methods, theoretical orientation, research design, qualitative-quantitative integration, professional knowledge development, relational approach

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review