The DOI matches its Crossref record.
From socialist ideology to cultural heritage: the changing basis oflegitimacy in the People's Republic of China
Abstract
There has been a shift over the past generation in the moral basis for legitimacy of the Chinese state. The socialist state was legitimated by a sinified version of Marxism-Leninism, watered with the blood of revolutionary martyrs who fought on behalf of the Communist Party to defend the nation from external aggressors. However, at many levels of society, the Marxist legitimation is dead. Instead of claiming to represent the values of Communist revolutionary struggle in the twentieth century, the state is now presenting itself as the carrier and the defender of 5000 years of national cultural heritage. This undoubtedly arises partly from changes in moral attitude arising from the grass roots and partly from government initiatives descending from the top down. There is wide variation across China in the intermingling between the bottom-up and top-down moral impulses, and this is partially connected with different moral ecologies constituted by configurations of state and local political and economic institutions throughout China. In this paper, based on case studies from fieldwork carried out in several different locations in 2009, the author draws a broad map of these variations.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
If Chinese religion was more a matter of belonging than belief, atheist scientific education would not affect it much.
“But if such religion was more a matter of belonging than belief, atheist education would not affect it much (Madsen 2014).”
From Secular Belief, Religious Belonging in China (2014) · cites this paper as Madsen 2014
In the author's fieldwork, several businessmen playfully contended with one another over who had put up the biggest temple.
“In my fieldwork, I heard several such businessmen playfully contending with one another over who had put up the biggest temple (Madsen, 2014).”
From Secular Belief, Religious Belonging in China (2014) · cites this paper as Madsen, 2014
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Becker, Jasper. 2000.The Chinese. New York: Free Press, 72–74.
- Bell Daniel, 2008, China's New Confucianism: Politics and Everyday Life in a Changing Society
- Bell Daniel, 2010, The Toronto Globe and Mail
- Brook Timothy, 2009, Making Religion, Making the State, 22
- Cao Nanlai, 2011, Constructing China's Jerusalem: Christians, Power, and Place in Contemporary Wenzhou
- 10.1353/jod.2010.0013 · DOI
- Overmeyer Daniel, 2006, Handan diqu minsu jilu (A compendium of Handan folk customs)
- Qian Sima, 1993, Records of the Grand Historian
- Schipper, Kristofer. 1993.The Taoist Body. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1–19.
- Tracy David, 1981, The Analogical Imagination: Christian Theology and the Culture of Pluralism
- 10.1017/S002191180400169X · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Secular Belief, Religious Belonging in China
Madsen, R. (2014) · Review of Religion and Chinese Society · doi:10.1163/22143955-04102003 · Cited by 9
Self-citationUntitled work
Laliberté, A. (2015) · Asiatische Studien-Études Asiatiques
Metadata
- Authors
- Madsen, R.
- Affiliations
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Corresponding author
- Madsen, Richard
- Venue
- Anthropology & Medicine
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-01-02
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 58-70
- ISSN
- 1364-8470 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-2910
- OpenAlex
- W2008832361
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 4.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Anthropology and Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Cultural Identity and Heritage
- Keywords
- state legitimacy, Chinese Communist Party, cultural heritage, socialist ideology, Marxism-Leninism, revolutionary martyrs, national identity, moral ecology, local political institutions, People's Republic of China
- MeSH terms
- China, Humans, Morals, Politics, Religion, Social Change, Socialism, Cultural Diversity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review