The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analysis of mortality rates for pancreatic cancer across the world
Open accessAbstract
INTRODUCTION Pancreas cancer is the fourth commonest cause of cancer-related mortality across the world, with incidence equalling mortality. A recent study has suggested that both the incidence and the mortality of pancreatic cancer are falling in the UK. We investigated whether this trend was being seen all over the world. METHODS Age-standardized mortality (world) rates [ASR(W)] for pancreatic cancer were extracted separately for males and females from a database maintained by the International Agency for Research on Cancer for 51 countries across the world (Europe, 33 countries; Americas, 8 countries; and Asia, 10 countries) for the period 1992-2002; log-linear regression analysis was performed to analyse trends in the past decade. RESULTS In the period 1992-2002, the ASR(W) remained static across most countries for both sexes. The highest mortality rates (for both sexes) were seen in Central Europe [range: men (8-12), women (4.5-7)] with trends towards increasing mortality in Romania (p<0.001), along with Albania, Spain and Croatia (p<0.01). Korea in the Far East, too, demonstrated increasing mortality trends for both sexes (men p<0.001, women p<0.01). Increasing mortality trends were also observed among women in France (p<0.001). In Canada, there was a decline in mortality [men (7.5-6.4), women (5.9-5); p<0.01], while for men there was a downward trend in Ireland, the UK, Switzerland, Austria, and Poland [p<0.05]. CONCLUSION The changes perhaps reflect standardization and consolidation of diagnostic tests for pancreatic cancer in the Western world and further in-depth analysis would be required.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jemal, A., Siegel, R., Ward, E., Murray, T., Xu, J., & Thun, M. J. (2007) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/canjclin.57.1.43 · Cited by 7,439
Cited by
Therapeutic Roles of Curcumin: Lessons Learned from Clinical Trials
Gupta, S. C., Patchva, S., & Aggarwal, B. B. (2013) · The AAPS Journal · doi:10.1208/s12248-012-9432-8 · Cited by 2,110
Imaging diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: A state-of-the-art review
Lee, E. S. (2014) · World Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.3748/wjg.v20.i24.7864 · Cited by 401
Berkovich, L., Earon, G., Ron, I., Rimmon, A., Vexler, A., & Lev-Ari, S. (2013) · BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine · doi:10.1186/1472-6882-13-212 · Cited by 285
Bang, J. Y., Hebert-Magee, S., Trevino, J., Ramesh, J., & Varadarajulu, S. (2012) · Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · doi:10.1016/j.gie.2012.03.1392 · Cited by 269
Zhang, Y., Cheng, C., Liu, Z., Wang, L., Pan, G., Sun, G., Chang, Y., Zuo, C., & Yang, X. (2019) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1002/mp.13733 · Cited by 80
Metadata
- Authors
- Hariharan, D., Saied, A., & Kocher, H. M.
- Venue
- HPB
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-02
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 58-62
- ISSN
- 1365-182X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2023377017
- Cited by
- 335
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of mortality rates for pancreatic cancer across the world. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13651820701883148
- The paper
- Hariharan, D., Saied, A., & Kocher, H. M. (2008). Analysis of mortality rates for pancreatic cancer across the world. HPB. https://doi.org/10.1080/13651820701883148
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.