Cited by 56

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Modeling visibility through vegetation

Llobera, Marcos·2007·International Journal of Geographical Information Science

Abstract

The calculation of visibility patterns associated with past monuments and sites is an important element in modern landscape archaeology. These types of investigations have been limited by the inability of current viewshed routines to incorporate vegetation information. The following paper presents a new viewshed algorithm aimed at calculating the probability of locations being visible in the presence of vegetation. To this day, little work has been done to address this limitation, a notable exception is Dean's Permeability Index Model (Citation1997). A review of Dean's model is provided here in the light of the new proposed algorithm. The new algorithm is based on mathematical principles found in Beer–Lambert's Attenuation Law, a physics law governing the attenuation of light through a medium. In addition to common viewshed parameters, the routine requires a 3D model of a tree/plant and a layer indicating the spatial distribution and density of vegetation on the landscape. The possibility of varying both, the spatial and density distribution of tree/plants, and the three‐dimensional model representing vegetation makes the model well suited to investigate the impact that vegetation may have on visibility patterns.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13658810601169865

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bare earth viewshed analysis has been critiqued as an unreliable and even spurious simulacrum of visibility affordances in areas with variably occlusive vegetation cover.

    “This type of bare earth viewshed analysis has been justifiably subjected to critique as an unreliable and even spurious simulacrum of visibility affordances in areas with variably occlusive vegetation cover (see, e.g., Gillings, 2009;Llobera, 2007aLlobera, , 2007b)).”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Barrett J. C., 1994, Fragements from Antiquity: An archaeology of social life in Britain, 2900–1200 BC
  2. 10.1068/b12854 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1068/b26101 · DOI
  4. 10.1139/cjfr-27-7-969 · DOI
  5. 10.1068/b220527 · DOI
  6. Friedlander K. S., 2000, Smoke, Dust and Aerosol: Fundamentals of Aerosol Dynamics
  7. Halliday D., 2004, Fundamentals in Physics
  8. Llobera M., 2006, Classics IJGIS
  9. Wheatley D. W., 2000, Beyond the Map, 1
  10. Tschan A., 2000, Beyond the Map, 29

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Llobera, M.
Venue
International Journal of Geographical Information Science
Published
2007-08
Volume
21
Issue
7
Pages
799-810
ISSN
  • 1365-8816
  • 1362-3087
Cited by
56
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review