The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Modeling visibility through vegetation
Abstract
The calculation of visibility patterns associated with past monuments and sites is an important element in modern landscape archaeology. These types of investigations have been limited by the inability of current viewshed routines to incorporate vegetation information. The following paper presents a new viewshed algorithm aimed at calculating the probability of locations being visible in the presence of vegetation. To this day, little work has been done to address this limitation, a notable exception is Dean's Permeability Index Model (Citation1997). A review of Dean's model is provided here in the light of the new proposed algorithm. The new algorithm is based on mathematical principles found in Beer–Lambert's Attenuation Law, a physics law governing the attenuation of light through a medium. In addition to common viewshed parameters, the routine requires a 3D model of a tree/plant and a layer indicating the spatial distribution and density of vegetation on the landscape. The possibility of varying both, the spatial and density distribution of tree/plants, and the three‐dimensional model representing vegetation makes the model well suited to investigate the impact that vegetation may have on visibility patterns.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Bare earth viewshed analysis has been critiqued as an unreliable and even spurious simulacrum of visibility affordances in areas with variably occlusive vegetation cover.
“This type of bare earth viewshed analysis has been justifiably subjected to critique as an unreliable and even spurious simulacrum of visibility affordances in areas with variably occlusive vegetation cover (see, e.g., Gillings, 2009;Llobera, 2007aLlobera, , 2007b)).”
From Modeling Marronage: GIS Heuristics of Refuge Affordances in Colonial St. Croix (2025) · cites this paper as Llobera, 2007a
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Barrett J. C., 1994, Fragements from Antiquity: An archaeology of social life in Britain, 2900–1200 BC
- 10.1068/b12854 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1068/b26101 · DOI
- 10.1139/cjfr-27-7-969 · DOI
- 10.1068/b220527 · DOI
- Friedlander K. S., 2000, Smoke, Dust and Aerosol: Fundamentals of Aerosol Dynamics
- Halliday D., 2004, Fundamentals in Physics
- Llobera M., 2006, Classics IJGIS
- Wheatley D. W., 2000, Beyond the Map, 1
- Tschan A., 2000, Beyond the Map, 29
Cited by
Sorted by citations
VISUAL AFFORDANCE, LANDSCAPE, AND THE MEGALITHS OF ALDERNEY
GILLINGS, M. (2009) · Oxford Journal of Archaeology · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0092.2009.00332.x · Cited by 79
Rubio-Campillo, X., Ble, E., Pujol, À., Sala, R., & Tamba, R. (2022) · Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory · doi:10.1007/s10816-022-09549-7 · Cited by 9
Modeling Marronage: GIS Heuristics of Refuge Affordances in Colonial St. Croix
Kohut, L. E., Wernke, S. A., & Dunnavant, J. (2025) · Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory · doi:10.1007/s10816-024-09680-7 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Llobera, M.
- Venue
- International Journal of Geographical Information Science
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-08
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 799-810
- ISSN
- 1365-8816
- 1362-3087
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review