The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An evaluation of void‐filling interpolation methods for SRTM data
Open accessAbstract
The Digital Elevation Model that has been derived from the February 2000 Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) has been one of the most important publicly available new spatial data sets in recent years. However, the ‘finished’ grade version of the data (also referred to as Version 2) still contains data voids (some 836,000 km2)—and other anomalies—that prevent immediate use in many applications. These voids can be filled using a range of interpolation algorithms in conjunction with other sources of elevation data, but there is little guidance on the most appropriate void‐filling method. This paper describes: (i) a method to fill voids using a variety of interpolators, (ii) a method to determine the most appropriate void‐filling algorithms using a classification of the voids based on their size and a typology of their surrounding terrain; and (iii) the classification of the most appropriate algorithm for each of the 3,339,913 voids in the SRTM data. Based on a sample of 1304 artificial but realistic voids across six terrain types and eight void size classes, we found that the choice of void‐filling algorithm is dependent on both the size and terrain type of the void. Contrary to some previous findings, the best methods can be generalised as: kriging or inverse distance weighting interpolation for small and medium size voids in relatively flat low‐lying areas; spline interpolation for small and medium‐sized voids in high‐altitude and dissected terrain; triangular irregular network or inverse distance weighting interpolation for large voids in very flat areas, and an advanced spline method (ANUDEM) for large voids in other terrains.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing
Nicol, J., King, B., Quattrochi, D., Dowman, I. J., Ehlers, M., & Xiaoli, D. (2007) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · Cited by 9,325
Rabus, B., Eineder, M., Roth, A., & Bamler, R. (2003) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/s0924-2716(02)00124-7 · Cited by 1,820
Shuttle radar topography mission produces a wealth of data
Farr, T. G., & Kobrick, M. (2000) · Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union · doi:10.1029/eo081i048p00583 · Cited by 1,440
A new procedure for gridding elevation and stream line data with automatic removal of spurious pits
Hutchinson, M. F. (1989) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/0022-1694(89)90073-5 · Cited by 1,254
A Global Assessment of the SRTM Performance
Rodríguez, E., Morris, C. S., & Belz, J. E. (2006) · Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing · doi:10.14358/pers.72.3.249 · Cited by 1,106
Choosing functions for semi‐variograms of soil properties and fitting them to sampling estimates
McBratney, A. B., & Webster, R. (1986) · Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.1986.tb00392.x · Cited by 614
A refinement of inverse distance weighted interpolation
Watson, D. F., & Philip, G. (1985) · Cited by 597
Geomorphometry - Concepts, Software, Applications
(2009) · Developments in Soil Science · doi:10.1016/s0166-2481(08)x0001-7 · Cited by 499
Meybeck, M., Green, P., & Vörösmarty, C. (2001) · Mountain Research and Development · doi:10.1659/0276-4741(2001)021[0034:antfma]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 406
Causes and consequences of error in digital elevation models
Fisher, P. F., & Tate, N. J. (2006) · Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment · doi:10.1191/0309133306pp492ra · Cited by 405
Cited by
An assessment of the global impact of 21st century land use change on soil erosion
Borrelli, P., Robinson, D. A., Fleischer, L. R., Lugato, E., Ballabio, C., Alewell, C., Meusburger, K., Modugno, S., Schütt, B., Ferro, V., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-02142-7 · Cited by 2,779
Hirt, C., Filmer, M. S., & Featherstone, W. E. (2010) · Australian Journal of Earth Sciences · doi:10.1080/08120091003677553 · Cited by 298
Rexer, M., & Hirt, C. (2014) · Australian Journal of Earth Sciences · doi:10.1080/08120099.2014.884983 · Cited by 193
A Global Analysis of Deforestation in Moist Tropical Forest Protected Areas
Spracklen, B. D., Kalamandeen, M., Galbraith, D., Gloor, E., & Spracklen, D. V. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0143886 · Cited by 141
Okolie, C. J., & Smit, J. L. (2022) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2022.03.016 · Cited by 139
Metadata
- Authors
- Reuter, H. I., Nelson, A., & Jarvis, A.
- Venue
- International Journal of Geographical Information Science
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-10
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 983-1008
- ISSN
- 0269-3798 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-8816
- 1362-3087
- OpenAlex
- W1990128059
- Cited by
- 915
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 13.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An evaluation of void‐filling interpolation methods for SRTM data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13658810601169899
- The paper
- Reuter, H. I., Nelson, A., & Jarvis, A. (2007). An evaluation of void‐filling interpolation methods for SRTM data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810601169899
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.