The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A new insight into land use classification based on aggregated mobile phone data
Open accessAbstract
Land-use classification is essential for urban planning. Urban land-use types can be differentiated either by their physical characteristics (such as reflectivity and texture) or social functions. Remote sensing techniques have been recognized as a vital method for urban land-use classification because of their ability to capture the physical characteristics of land use. Although significant progress has been achieved in remote sensing methods designed for urban land-use classification, most techniques focus on physical characteristics, whereas knowledge of social functions is not adequately used. Owing to the wide usage of mobile phones, the activities of residents, which can be retrieved from the mobile phone data, can be determined in order to indicate the social function of land use. This could bring about the opportunity to derive land-use information from mobile phone data. To verify the application of this new data source to urban land-use classification, we first construct a vector of aggregated mobile phone data to characterize land-use types. This vector is composed of two aspects: the normalized hourly call volume and the total call volume. A semi-supervised fuzzy c-means clustering approach is then applied to infer the land-use types. The method is validated using mobile phone data collected in Singapore. Land use is determined with a detection rate of 58.03%. An analysis of the land-use classification results shows that the detection rate decreases as the heterogeneity of land use increases, and increases as the density of cell phone towers increases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms
Bezdek, J. C. (1981) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-0450-1 · Cited by 9,881
Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing
Nicol, J., King, B., Quattrochi, D., Dowman, I. J., Ehlers, M., & Xiaoli, D. (2007) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · Cited by 9,325
Understanding individual human mobility patterns
González, M. C., Hidalgo, C. A., & Barabási, A.-L. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06958 · Cited by 6,059
Spatial Tessellations: Concepts and Applications of Voronoi Diagrams
Okabe, A., Boots, B. N., & Sugihara, K. (1992) · Cited by 3,546
Limits of Predictability in Human Mobility
Song, C., Qu, Z., Blumm, N., & Barabási, A.-L. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1177170 · Cited by 3,234
(2000) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470317013 · Cited by 1,811
Mobile Landscapes: Using Location Data from Cell Phones for Urban Analysis
Ratti, C., Frenchman, D., Pulselli, R. M., & Williams, S. (2006) · Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design · doi:10.1068/b32047 · Cited by 864
Self-citationUse of impervious surface in urban land-use classification
Lu, D., & Weng, Q. (2006) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2006.02.010 · Cited by 656
Ray, S., & Turi, R. H. (2000) · International Conference on Advances in Pattern Recognition · Cited by 541
Cited by
Gao, S., Janowicz, K., & Couclelis, H. (2017) · Transactions in GIS · doi:10.1111/tgis.12289 · Cited by 468
Mapping Urban Land Use by Using Landsat Images and Open Social Data
Hu, T., Yang, J., Li, X., & Gong, P. (2016) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs8020151 · Cited by 389
Tu, W., Cao, J., Yue, Y., Shaw, S.-L., Zhou, M., Wang, Z., Chang, X., Xu, Y., & Li, Q. (2017) · International Journal of Geographical Information Science · doi:10.1080/13658816.2017.1356464 · Cited by 298
Self-citationA Collaborative Internet of Things Architecture for Smart Cities and Environmental Monitoring
Montori, F., Bedogni, L., & Bononi, L. (2018) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2017.2720855 · Cited by 282
Understanding Mobile Traffic Patterns of Large Scale Cellular Towers in Urban Environment
Xu, F., Li, Y., Wang, H., Zhang, P., & Jin, D. (2017) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking · doi:10.1109/tnet.2016.2623950 · Cited by 256
Metadata
- Authors
- Pei, T., Sobolevsky, S., Ratti, C., Shaw, S.-L., Li, T., & Zhou, C.
- Venue
- International Journal of Geographical Information Science
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-05-08
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1988-2007
- ISSN
- 0269-3798 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-8816
- 1362-3087
- OpenAlex
- W1972631516
- Cited by
- 397
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 58.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A new insight into land use classification based on aggregated mobile phone data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13658816.2014.913794
- The paper
- Pei, T., Sobolevsky, S., Ratti, C., Shaw, S.-L., Li, T., & Zhou, C. (2014). A new insight into land use classification based on aggregated mobile phone data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2014.913794
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.