The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Impact of Regulation-Driven Environmental Innovation on Innovation Success and Firm Performance
Abstract
The impact of environmental innovations on firm performance is ambiguous. On the one hand, regulatory-driven environmental innovation may impose additional costs to firms and lower their profits. On the other hand, eco-innovators could profit from lower uncertainty in innovation due to regulatory standards and demand-generating effects of regulation. In this paper we analyse (a) whether regulation-driven environmental innovation generates similar innovation success compared to other types of product and process innovation, and (b) whether regulation-driven environmental innovation increases or decreases firm success (as measured by return on sales). Using firm data from the German innovation survey, we find that both product and process innovations driven by environmental regulation generate similar success in terms of sales with new products and cost savings as other innovations do. However, we find different effects when looking at the field of environmental regulation that triggered innovations. Regulations in favour of sustainable mobility contribute to higher sales with market novelties while regulations in the field of water management lower this type of innovation success. With regard to a firm's price–cost margin, new processes implemented in order to comply with environmental regulation requirements lower profitability, indicating higher costs for this type of innovation which cannot be passed on through prices. Higher profit margins can be observed for firms with innovations triggered by regulations on recycling and waste management as well as on resource efficiency.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error
Heckman, J. J. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912352 · Cited by 28,779
Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship
Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. V. D. (1995) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.9.4.97 · Cited by 13,365
Redefining innovation — eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics
Rennings, K. (2000) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(99)00112-3 · Cited by 3,226
Self-citation
Cited by
Li, D., Zheng, M., Cao, C., Chen, X., Ren, S., & Huang, M. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.123 · Cited by 641
Rogge, K. S., & Schleich, J. (2018) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.05.011 · Cited by 193
Bornkessel, S., Bröring, S., & (Onno) Omta, S. W. F. (2016) · PharmaNutrition · doi:10.1016/j.phanu.2015.10.002 · Cited by 17
Chuang, H.-K., & Liao, C.-S. (2018) · Journal of Environmental Planning and Management · doi:10.1080/09640568.2017.1389700 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Rennings, K., & Rammer, C.
- Venue
- Industry & Innovation
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-04
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 255-283
- ISSN
- 1366-2716 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8390
- OpenAlex
- W1530974776
- Cited by
- 399
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 29.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Impact of Regulation-Driven Environmental Innovation on Innovation Success and Firm Performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13662716.2011.561027
- The paper
- Rennings, K., & Rammer, C. (2011). The Impact of Regulation-Driven Environmental Innovation on Innovation Success and Firm Performance. Industry & Innovation. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2011.561027
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.