The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Using e‐learning to support primary trainee teachers’ development of mathematical subject knowledge: An analysis of learning and the impact on confidence
Open accessAbstract
This article explores the effectiveness of a mathematics subject knowledge development model that integrates conventional text‐based distance learning with an e‐learning coaching and peer group conferencing environment. The effectiveness of the model in supporting 194 trainee primary (pupil’s aged 5–11 years) teachers achievement of the subject knowledge standards required for qualified teacher status is evaluated and the impact of the model on trainee confidence is explored. Features of the model that trainees, tutors and post‐qualifiying teachers identify as critical factors for success are outlined and the relevance of the model for teacher professional development is discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“regular discussions and high levels of support and cooperation among group members (Burgess and Mayes 2008;Vinagre 2017;Yeh 2010) were more likely to drive constructive environments and better performance,”
From COVID-19 and teacher education: a literature review of online teaching and learning practices (2020) · cites this paper as Burgess and Mayes 2008
In the citing paper
“Regarding the development of relevant and authentic assignments, some design principles included: adding an interactive component to online learning activities that enabled a constructive, dialogic approach to e-learning (Baker and Watson 2014); focusing on problems of the everyday teaching practice that promoted learners' participation and their ability to apply new knowledge (Burgess and Mayes 2”
From COVID-19 and teacher education: a literature review of online teaching and learning practices (2020) · cites this paper as Burgess and Mayes 2008
In the citing paper
“targeting individual needs, strengths and interests (Burgess and Mayes 2008;Chambers, Threlfall, and Roper 2012;Coole and Watts 2009;Tai et al. 2019), including also preferred e-learning styles (Coole and Watts 2009;Ducan and Barnett 2009), and users' technology experience (Chieu, Herbst, and Weiss 2011);”
From COVID-19 and teacher education: a literature review of online teaching and learning practices (2020) · cites this paper as Burgess and Mayes 2008
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 45
- 10.1080/0141192960220203 · DOI
- Ball D.L., 1988, For the Learning of Mathematics, 8, 40
- 10.1080/0267152032000048587 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-2729.2000.00137.x · DOI
- 10.1080/0141192022000015543 · DOI
- 10.1080/0141192990250303 · DOI
- Burgess, H. and Shelton Mayes, A. The role of new technologies in initial teacher education: A focus on developing subject knowledge in primary mathematics. Paper presented to conference at British Educational Research Association (BERA). September13–15. in Leeds
- 10.1080/1361126032000138337 · DOI
- 1998, Passport to mathematics, M521
- 10.1023/A:1003504816467 · DOI
- 1998, Teaching: High status, high sandards. Requirements for courses of initial teacher training. Circular 4/98
- 1998, The national literacy strategy: Framework for teaching
- 1999, Framework for teaching mathematics from reception to year 6
- 2002, Qualifying to teach: Professional standards for qualified teacher status and requirements for initial teacher training
- 2004, Clarke presses ahead with reform of mathematics education
- Edwards A., 1996, Mentoring and developing practice in primary school
- 10.1016/S0742-051X(98)00020-1 · DOI
- Elbaz F., 1983, Teacher thinking: A study of practical knowledge
- Hackett G., 1999, Times Educational Supplement
- Hill L., 2000, Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 6, 23, 10.1080/135406000114735 · DOI
- 10.1080/03054980701451090 · DOI
- Joseph G.G., 2000, Crest of the Peacock: The Non‐European Roots of Mathematics
- Laurillard D., 1993, Journal of Educational Television, 19, 81, 10.1080/0260741930190204 · DOI
- 10.1080/0260747022000057927 · DOI
- 10.1080/0260747930190308 · DOI
- 10.1023/B:EDUC.0000028401.51537.a5 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1003177809664 · DOI
- Nias J., 1989, Primary teachers talking: A study of teaching as work
- 1999, Primary follow‐up survey of the training of trainees to teach reading and number (1996–98)
- 2001, Open University primary postgraduate certificate in education inspection report
- 2003, Quality of standards in primary initial teacher training: Inspected 1998–2002
- 1998, ITT inspection methodology
- Oldroyd D., 1991, Managing staff development: A handbook for secondary schools
- 2003, Watching and learning 3: Final report of the external evaluation of England’s national literacy and numeracy strategies
- Salmon G., 2003, E‐moderating: The key to teaching and learning on‐line
- 10.1016/S0742-051X(98)00027-4 · DOI
- Burstein L., 1993, The IEA Study of Mathematics
- Skemp R.R., 1989, Mathematics in the primary school, 10.4324/9780203403891 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00052-4 · DOI
- 10.1111/1467-9604.00058 · DOI
- 2004, Postgraduate professional development (PPD)
- 2004, Flexible training routes
- Beaton A., 1996, Mathematical achievement in the middle years: IEA’s third international and science study
- 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1993.tb01072.x · DOI
- Wilcox B., 1993, Educational research and evaluation for policy and practice?, 81
Cited by
Sorted by citations
COVID-19 and teacher education: a literature review of online teaching and learning practices
Carrillo, C., & Flores, M. A. (2020) · European Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/02619768.2020.1821184 · Cited by 1,019
Metadata
- Authors
- Burgess, H., & Mayes, A. S.
- Affiliations
- The Open University (GB)
- University of Northampton (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Burgess, Hilary
- Venue
- Teacher Development
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-02
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 37-55
- ISSN
- 1366-4530 (ISSN-L)
- 1747-5120
- OpenAlex
- W1995835123
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 5.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Teacher Development (publishedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Programs
- Keywords
- online learning, teacher professional development, distance education, coaching, teacher confidence, Qualified Teacher Status, mathematics teacher education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
