The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
The mental load: building a deeper theoretical understanding of how cognitive and emotional labor over load women and mothers
Abstract
The mental load has received considerable public attention especially in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this article, we synthesize existing literature to argue that the mental load is a combination of cognitive and emotional labor and it is this combination that makes the mental work a load. We argue that the way the mental load operates within families and society has three characteristics: (1) it is invisible in that it is enacted internally yet results in a range of unpaid, physical labor; (2) it is boundaryless in that can be brought to work and into leisure and sleep time; and (3) enduring in that it is never complete because it is tied to caring for loved ones which is constant. We also offer some future directions for addressing the problems associated with the mental load. First, questions measuring the mental load should be standard in health and social surveys to better understand the problem. Second, employers should adopt better policies that allow for greater work-life reconciliation to lessen the mental load. Third, caregiving should be vital infrastructure developed and invested in by governments to reduce competing work and care demands that accelerate the deleterious consequences of the mental load.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 75 · Cited by 322
Research works printed but not linked: 64
- 10.4054/DemRes.2015.32.30 · DOI
- Adam, B. (1995). Timewatch: The social analysis of time. Polity Press.
- 10.1080/13545701.2011.582822 · DOI
- 10.1177/0891243214546936 · DOI
- 10.1348/096317903769647229 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00148-012-0408-x · DOI
- 10.1177/00113921211012737 · DOI
- 10.1177/1440783319893754 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1533-8525.1985.tb00217.x · DOI
- 10.1111/jomf.12320 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00769.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0891243205285212 · DOI
- 10.1177/0192513X18776419 · DOI
- 10.1111/jomf.2019.81.issue-2 · DOI
- 10.1111/gwao.v28.S1 · DOI
- 10.1177/08912432211001303 · DOI
- 10.1080/13545701.2020.1831039 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1530-3535(01)80031-5 · DOI
- 10.1177/0003122419859007 · DOI
- 10.2307/800538 · DOI
- DeVault, M. L. (1991). Family discourse and everyday practice: Gender and class at the dinner table. Syracuse Scholar, 11(1), 1979–1991.
- 10.1108/09578239410051853 · DOI
- 10.1177/0891243210361475 · DOI · Paper page
- Federici, S. (1995). Wages against housework. In E. Malos (Ed.), The politics of housework (pp. 262–292). New Clarion.
- 10.2307/353307 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2015.00045.x · DOI · Paper page
- Gopher, D. (1994). “Analysis and measurement of mental load”. In P. Berthelson, P. Eelen, & G. d’Ydewalle (Eds.), International Perspectives on psychological science 2: The state of the Art (pp. 262–292). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- 10.1016/j.wsif.2014.03.005 · DOI
- 10.5665/sleep.5066 · DOI
- 10.2307/j.ctvjsf48h · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1108/02632770810864970 · DOI
- 10.1080/15402002.2012.694382 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1467-9566.2003.00371.x · DOI
- Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: The commercialization of human feeling. University of California press.
- Hochschild, A. R. (1989). The second shift: Working parents and the revolution at home. Viking.
- 10.1111/j.1743-4580.1997.tb00019.x · DOI
- 10.1525/9780520935167 · DOI
- Hochschild, A. R. (2012). The outsourced self: What happens when we pay others to live our lives for us. Metropolitan Books.
- 10.1215/00703370-9613354 · DOI
- 10.2307/584119 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.0022-2445.2005.00119.x · DOI
- 10.3316/ielapa.178577803751754 · DOI
- 10.1177/0950017014523661 · DOI
- 10.1108/14777260510615369 · DOI
- 10.1257/aer.20161500 · DOI
- 10.1111/jomf.2018.80.issue-4 · DOI
- 10.1353/sof.0.0101 · DOI
- 10.1177/000312240907400607 · DOI
- Milkie, M. A., & Warner, C. H. (2014). Status safeguarding: Mothering as safety net. In L. Ennis (Ed.), Intensive mothering: The cultural contradictions of modern motherhood (pp. 66–85). Demeter Press.
- 10.1177/0192513X05277524 · DOI
- 10.1111/socf.12126 · DOI
- 10.1086/493663 · DOI
- 10.1111/gwao.12614 · DOI
- 10.1177/0361684319825581 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.04.006 · DOI
- 10.1111/gwao.v28.5 · DOI
- 10.1353/sof.2005.0126 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2007.00076.x · DOI
- 10.1332/204674320X16059402201264 · DOI
- Walzer, S. (1998). Thinking about the baby: Gender and transitions into parenthood. Temple University Press.
- Weeks, K. (2007). Life within and against work: Affective labor, feminist critique, and post-Fordist politics. Ephemera, 7(1), 233–249.
- 10.1002/smi.2496 · DOI
- 10.1177/0891243217695520 · DOI
- 10.1111/soin.12013 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Dean, L., Churchill, B., & Ruppanner, L.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Churchill, Brendan
- Venue
- Community, Work & Family
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2021-11-24
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 13-29
- ISSN
- 1366-8803 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-3615
- OpenAlex
- W3215678813
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 75
- Citations by year
- 2026: 94 · 2025: 90 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 19
- FWCI
- 47.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Community Work & Family (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies
- Keywords
- mental workload, cognitive work, emotional labor, mothers, women, caregiving, invisible work, unpaid work, work-life integration, work-family conflict, COVID-19 pandemic, employer policies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review