Cited by 53EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningMotivation and Self-Concept in SportsEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

The case of a missing person? The current L2 self and the L2 Motivational Self System

Open access
Thorsen, Cecilia, Henry, Alastair, Cliffordson, Christina·2020·International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism

Abstract

In the L2 Motivational Self System (L2MSS) motivation is conceptualized to be generated by discomfort associated with the learner's experience of a discrepancy between their current L2 self, and their ideal L2 self. However, in the L2MSS model, this discrepancy is not operationalized. A questionnaire containing measures of current L2 selves was administered to two cohorts of students learning English in Sweden, one in grade 7, and one in grade 9. Using structural equation modeling, results revealed that the discrepancy between the ideal L2 self and the current L2 self was greater for the grade 7 cohort. So too was the impact on a criterion variable measuring intended effort. Arguments for the operationalization of the self-discrepancy process in research designs are put forward. In studies tracking changes over time, it is suggested that the inclusion of a variable measuring the current L2 self could provide important insights into self-discrepancy trajectories, facilitate the investigation of motivational dynamics, and bring greater sensitivity to intervention-design.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13670050.2017.1388356

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This discrepancy is not currently featured in how self-guides are measured.

    “Unfortunately, this discrepancy is not currently featured in how self-guides are measured (Thorsen, Henry, & Cliffordson, 2017).”

    From The L2 motivational self system: A meta-analysis (2018) · cites this paper as Thorsen, Henry, & Cliffordson, 2017

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thorsen, C., Henry, A., & Cliffordson, C.
Affiliations
  • Department of Social and Behavioural studies, University West, Trollhättan, Sweden
  • University West (SE)
Venue
International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism
Published
2017-10-23
Volume
23
Issue
5
Pages
584-600
ISSN
  • 1367-0050 (ISSN-L)
  • 1747-7522
OpenAlex
W2765157530
Cited by
53
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5
FWCI
13.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism (publishedVersion)
  • Diva portal (Dalarna University Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
L2 Motivational Self System, ideal L2 self, self-discrepancy, second language motivation, English as a foreign language, intended effort, self-concept

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review