The case of a missing person? The current L2 self and the L2 Motivational Self System
Open accessAbstract
In the L2 Motivational Self System (L2MSS) motivation is conceptualized to be generated by discomfort associated with the learner's experience of a discrepancy between their current L2 self, and their ideal L2 self. However, in the L2MSS model, this discrepancy is not operationalized. A questionnaire containing measures of current L2 selves was administered to two cohorts of students learning English in Sweden, one in grade 7, and one in grade 9. Using structural equation modeling, results revealed that the discrepancy between the ideal L2 self and the current L2 self was greater for the grade 7 cohort. So too was the impact on a criterion variable measuring intended effort. Arguments for the operationalization of the self-discrepancy process in research designs are put forward. In studies tracking changes over time, it is suggested that the inclusion of a variable measuring the current L2 self could provide important insights into self-discrepancy trajectories, facilitate the investigation of motivational dynamics, and bring greater sensitivity to intervention-design.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This discrepancy is not currently featured in how self-guides are measured.
“Unfortunately, this discrepancy is not currently featured in how self-guides are measured (Thorsen, Henry, & Cliffordson, 2017).”
From The L2 motivational self system: A meta-analysis (2018) · cites this paper as Thorsen, Henry, & Cliffordson, 2017
Cites
On structural equation modeling with data that are not missing completely at random
Muthén, B., Kaplan, D., & Hollis, M. (1987) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02294365 · Cited by 883 · see citing works
The Psychology of the Language Learner
Dörnyei, Z. (2014) · doi:10.4324/9781410613349 · Cited by 700 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The L2 motivational self system: A meta-analysis
Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2018) · Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.4.2 · Cited by 351 · see citing works
- Authors
- Thorsen, C., Henry, A., & Cliffordson, C.
- Affiliations
- Department of Social and Behavioural studies, University West, Trollhättan, Sweden
- University West (SE)
- Venue
- International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-10-23
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 584-600
- ISSN
- 1367-0050 (ISSN-L)
- 1747-7522
- OpenAlex
- W2765157530
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5
- FWCI
- 13.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- urn.kb.se
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism (publishedVersion)
- Diva portal (Dalarna University Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Keywords
- L2 Motivational Self System, ideal L2 self, self-discrepancy, second language motivation, English as a foreign language, intended effort, self-concept
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review