Cited by 538Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchResilience and Mental Health

Religion, spirituality, and posttraumatic growth: a systematic review

Shaw, Annick, Joseph, Stephen, Linley, P. Alex·2005·Mental Health, Religion & Culture

Abstract

A search of the published literature identified 11 empirical studies that reported links between religion, spirituality, and posttraumatic growth. A review of these 11 studies produced three main findings. First, these studies show that religion and spirituality are usually, although not always, beneficial to people in dealing with the aftermath of trauma. Second, that traumatic experiences can lead to a deepening of religion or spirituality. Third, that positive religious coping, religious openness, readiness to face existential questions, religious participation, and intrinsic religiousness are typically associated with posttraumatic growth. Important directions for future research are suggested that centre on the need for more fine-grained analysis of religion and spirituality variables, together with longitudinal research designs, that allow more detailed exploration of the links between religion, spirituality, and posttraumatic growth.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1367467032000157981

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Once someone learns how to forgive a spiritual violation of trauma, they may then have skills and spiritual development that provide a firm foundation to support future forgiveness, which is highly correlated with posttraumatic growth.

    “Yet, once someone learns how to forgive a spiritual violation of trauma, they may then have skills and spiritual development (Park et al. 2017) that provide a firm foundation to support future forgiveness, which is highly correlated with posttraumatic growth (Shaw et al. 2005).”
  • Positive spiritual coping is robustly associated with posttraumatic growth.

    “Though Joseph would not experience this in time to spare himself or others, positive spiritual coping is also “robustly associated with posttraumatic growth”, as is shown by Shaw et al. (2005).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 85 · Cited by 538

Authors
Shaw, A., Joseph, S., & Linley, P. A.
Affiliations
University of Warwick (GB)
Corresponding author
Joseph, Stephen
Venue
Mental Health, Religion & Culture
Published
2005-03
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
1-11
ISSN
  • 1367-4676 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-9737
OpenAlex
W2047143007
Cited by
538
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 22
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Mental Health Religion & Culture (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
Keywords
religion, spirituality, posttraumatic growth, trauma, religious coping, religious openness, existential questions, religious participation, intrinsic religiosity, coping with trauma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review