Religion, spirituality, and posttraumatic growth: a systematic review
Abstract
A search of the published literature identified 11 empirical studies that reported links between religion, spirituality, and posttraumatic growth. A review of these 11 studies produced three main findings. First, these studies show that religion and spirituality are usually, although not always, beneficial to people in dealing with the aftermath of trauma. Second, that traumatic experiences can lead to a deepening of religion or spirituality. Third, that positive religious coping, religious openness, readiness to face existential questions, religious participation, and intrinsic religiousness are typically associated with posttraumatic growth. Important directions for future research are suggested that centre on the need for more fine-grained analysis of religion and spirituality variables, together with longitudinal research designs, that allow more detailed exploration of the links between religion, spirituality, and posttraumatic growth.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Once someone learns how to forgive a spiritual violation of trauma, they may then have skills and spiritual development that provide a firm foundation to support future forgiveness, which is highly correlated with posttraumatic growth.
“Yet, once someone learns how to forgive a spiritual violation of trauma, they may then have skills and spiritual development (Park et al. 2017) that provide a firm foundation to support future forgiveness, which is highly correlated with posttraumatic growth (Shaw et al. 2005).”
From Trauma, Spirituality, and Healing: A Journey through the Lens of an Incarcerated Person (2022) · cites this paper as Shaw et al. 2005
Positive spiritual coping is robustly associated with posttraumatic growth.
“Though Joseph would not experience this in time to spare himself or others, positive spiritual coping is also “robustly associated with posttraumatic growth”, as is shown by Shaw et al. (2005).”
From Trauma, Spirituality, and Healing: A Journey through the Lens of an Incarcerated Person (2022) · cites this paper as Shaw et al. (2005)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 85 · Cited by 538
- Authors
- Shaw, A., Joseph, S., & Linley, P. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Warwick (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Joseph, Stephen
- ORCID
- Joseph, Stephen
- Venue
- Mental Health, Religion & Culture
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-11
- ISSN
- 1367-4676 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-9737
- OpenAlex
- W2047143007
- Cited by
- 538
- References
- 85
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 22
- FWCI
- 1.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Mental Health Religion & Culture (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
- Keywords
- religion, spirituality, posttraumatic growth, trauma, religious coping, religious openness, existential questions, religious participation, intrinsic religiosity, coping with trauma
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review