Cited by 7Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsParanormal Experiences and Beliefs

“It’s like a charge – either fuses you or burns you out”: an interpretative phenomenological analysis of extreme mental states in meditation context

Open access
Kaselionyte, Justina, Gumley, Andrew·2017·Mental Health, Religion & Culture

Abstract

Meditation, an ancient Eastern spiritual practice, is increasingly being practised in the West where its benefits for mental and physical health have been established. Extreme mental states that can be encountered in the context of meditation have also been reported and often have been labelled as psychosis or spiritual emergency. This study aimed for more nuanced understanding of the phenomena. Interpretative phenomenological analysis was employed to explore the meaning-making of three meditation teachers from different philosophical traditions. The teachers described phenomenology of various extreme mental states, explained their nature according to their traditions and discussed ways of helping persons who experience these. Significance was given to having a spiritual teacher to provide guidance and support. The study highlights the importance of acknowledging the diverse understandings of the phenomena and cultivating a non-judgemental attitude towards it, which could help clinicians and meditation teachers work together to support persons experiencing these.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13674676.2017.1422237

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Like in the present study, some teachers in VanderKooi (1997) and Kaselionyte and Gumley (2017) attributed the cause of extreme states or mental health challenges to meditators overidentifying with nonordinary states of consciousness and being unable to disidentify and let go.

    “Like in the present study, some teachers in VanderKooi (1997) and Kaselionyte and Gumley (2017) attributed the cause of extreme states or mental health challenges (e.g. psychosis) to meditators 'overidentifying' with nonordinary states of consciousness and 'being unable to disidentify and let go' (VanderKooi 1997, 40).”

    From The Teacher Matters: The Role and Impact of Meditation Teachers in the Trajectories of Western Buddhist Meditators Experiencing Meditation-Related Challenges (2025) · cites this paper as Kaselionyte and Gumley (2017)

    In “Things are arising, continuing, passing away” (p. 11), a teacher says that giving unusual experiences too much attention probably led some practitioners into delusions, and urges letting go. “Comparison with literature” (p. 16) likewise says that becoming caught up in extreme states could lead to difficulties. The paper does not say that overidentification causes the extreme states themselves or establish psychosis as an outcome, so the citing sentence overstates the causal claim. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Buddhist teachers interviewed in Kaselionyte and Gumley (2017) acknowledged the limitations of their own monastic training for working with mental health challenges and expressed a willingness to refer practitioners to mental health professionals.

    “Buddhist teachers interviewed in Kaselionyte and Gumley (2017) acknowledged the limitations of their own monastic training for working with mental health challenges and expressed a willingness to refer practi­ tioners to mental health professionals.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 7

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Chan-Ob, T., & Boonyanaruthee, V. (1999). Meditation in association with psychosis. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand , 82, 925-929.
  2. Hazari, N., & Sarkar , S. (2014). A Review of Yoga and Meditation Neuroimaging Studies in Healthy Subjects. Alternative and Complementary Therapies , 20, 16-26.
  3. Johnson, C. V., & Friedman, H. L. (2008). Enlightened or delusional?: Differentiating religious, spiritual, and transpersonal experiences from psychopathology. Journal of Humanistic Psychology , 48, 505-527.
  4. Kornfield, J. (1979). Intensive insight meditation: A phenomenological study. The Journal of Transpersonal Psychology , 11, 41-58.
  5. Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing . Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
  6. Ospina, M. B., Bond, K., Karkhaneh, M., Buscemi, N., Dryden, D. M., Barnes, V., ... Shannahoff-Khalsa, D. (2008). Clinical trials of meditation practices in health care: Characteristics and quality. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine , 14, 11991213.
  7. Ossoff, J. (1993). Reflections of Shaktipat : psychosis or the rise of Kundalini? A case study. The Journal of Transpersonal Psychology , 25, 29-42.
  8. Paradkar, A., & Chaturvedi, S. (2010). Physio-kundalini syndrome with neurocognitive deficits. International Journal of Culture and Mental Health , 3, 25-33.
  9. Shapiro (Jr.), D. H., (1992). Adverse effects of meditation: a preliminary investigation of long-term meditators. International Journal of Psychosomatics . 39, 62-67.
  10. Sharma, P., Singh, S., Gnanavel, S., & Kumar, N. (2016). Meditation - a two edged sword for psychosis: a case report. Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine , 33, 247-249.
  11. Smith, J. (2011). Evaluating the contribution of interpretative phenomenological analysis. Health Psychology Review , 5, 9-27.
  12. Smith, J.A. & Osborn, M. (2008) Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J.A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods , (p. 53-80). London: Sage.
  13. VanderKooi, L. (1997). Buddhist teachers' experience with extreme mental states in western meditators. The Journal of Transpersonal Psychology , 29, 31-46.
  14. Willig, C. (2001). Introducing qualitative research in psychology: Adventures in theory and method . Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Authors
Kaselionyte, J., & Gumley, A.
Affiliations
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
Corresponding author
Kaselionyte, Justina
Venue
Mental Health, Religion & Culture
Published
2017-11-26
Volume
20
Issue
10
Pages
986-1001
ISSN
  • 1367-4676 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-9737
OpenAlex
W2783130074
Cited by
7
References
45
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-sa
Locations
  • Mental Health Religion & Culture (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
Keywords
meditation, spiritual crisis, psychosis, meaning-making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review