Pathways to educational engagement: an exploratory study of outcomes from an Australian school-based youth mentoring program
Open accessAbstract
School-based mentoring (SBM) programs are seen as a way of preventing the disengagement of young people from education. However, existing research points to a complex relationship between SBM programs and improved engagement outcomes. There is therefore a need for greater understanding of the pathways through which SBM leads to outcomes for young people. This paper addresses this complexity, examining the nuanced ways in which SBM may lead to positive outcomes for young people. Drawing on the qualitative perspectives of 15 young people engaged in an Australian SBM program, the findings point to two types of pathways to outcomes. First, direct pathways go to the heart of young people’s engagement, by prioritizing educational performance and achievement as the focus of the mentoring relationship. Second, holistic pathways see mentors seeking to influence young people’s broader thinking about the value of education, their wellbeing and their communication skills, to in turn address issues that may otherwise present barriers to young people’s engagement. The paper discusses the policy implications of the findings. It highlights the importance of acknowledging and measuring incremental steps to improved educational engagement, in a context of young people experiencing non-linear and complex pathways to engagement outcomes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The SBM program helped students develop interpersonal communication, problem solving, and decision-making skills.
“The program also helped students develop a variety of skills, such as interpersonal communication, problem solving, and decision-making (Meltzer et al., 2020; Green et al., 2021, 2022).”
From Outcome domains and assessment measures in school-based youth mentoring programs: a systematic review (2026) · cites this paper as Meltzer et al., 2020
The SBM program improved self-regulated learning.
“self-regulated learning (Meltzer et al., 2020; Martins et al., 2024)”
From Outcome domains and assessment measures in school-based youth mentoring programs: a systematic review (2026) · cites this paper as Meltzer et al., 2020
The SBM program improved mental health.
“mental health (Crooks et al., 2017; Meltzer et al. (2020); Green et al.,2021, 2022;)”
From Outcome domains and assessment measures in school-based youth mentoring programs: a systematic review (2026) · cites this paper as Meltzer et al., 2020
Among the studies reviewed, significant positive outcomes were observed even with short mentoring durations of 3 to 9 months.
“In contrast, among the studies we reviewed, significant positive outcomes were observed even with short mentoring durations of 3 to 9months (e.g., Green et al., 2021; Simões and Alarcão, 2014; Meltzer et al., 2020).”
From Outcome domains and assessment measures in school-based youth mentoring programs: a systematic review (2026) · cites this paper as Meltzer et al., 2020
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 34 · Cited by 14
- Authors
- Meltzer, A., Powell, A., & Saunders, I.
- Affiliations
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Meltzer, Ariella
- Venue
- Journal of Youth Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-06-27
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 545-560
- ISSN
- 1367-6261 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-9680
- OpenAlex
- W2953742321
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 1.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of Youth Studies (publishedVersion)
- Lincoln Repository (University of Lincoln) (acceptedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Macquarie Group Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mentoring and Academic Development
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Youth Education and Societal Dynamics
- Keywords
- school-based mentoring, youth mentoring programs, academic engagement, student disengagement, academic performance, value of education, student well-being, communication skills, mentoring relationships, youth policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review