The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Accurate retrieval of region of interest for estimating point spread function and image deblurring
Abstract
Extraction of an optimal region of interest (ROI) is crucial in many image processing applications, such as estimation of the point spread function (PSF) and blind deconvolution (BD). Although the amount of publications on PSF and BD is quite extensive; however, the work on ROI estimation has not received much attention. Existing methods which used heuristic models are not only time-consuming but also computationally expensive. In this paper, we proposed a new ROI retrieval scheme based on image partitioning and entropy measurement feedback. This method has low computation cost since it contains no matrix operations. Comprehensive experiments on real and synthetic datasets revealed that the proposed method is competitive when compared with existing search techniques, averaging at 26.1 dB, 0.46 and 1.44 on peak signal-to-noise ratio, universal image quality index and error ratio scales, respectively. On average, the proposed method takes less than 10 s to retrieve the ROI which is significantly faster compared to established solution.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Shapri and Abdullah [53] show that the performance of the image deblurring algorithm varies with the region of interest.”
From A Comprehensive Review of Blind Deconvolution Techniques for Image Deblurring (2020) · cites this paper as [53]
In the citing paper
“Along with the choice of different priors accurate Region of Interest identification plays a crucial role in the image deblurring algorithm.”
From A Comprehensive Review of Blind Deconvolution Techniques for Image Deblurring (2020) · cites this paper as [53]
Citations
Cites
Robust Multichannel Blind Deconvolution via Fast Alternating Minimization
Sroubek, F., & Milanfar, P. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2011.2175740 · Cited by 180
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- 10.1109/LGRS.2013.2281827 · DOI
- 10.1109/TMI.2013.2255883 · DOI
- Hwang YT, 2015, International Conference on Consumer Electronics, 388
- 10.1080/09500340.2015.1074738 · DOI
- 10.1109/TBME.2011.2174235 · DOI
- 10.1145/1618452.1618491 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.image.2013.05.001 · DOI
- 10.1080/13682199.2016.1157955 · DOI
- 10.1137/040605412 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TPAMI.2015.2481418 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s11263-015-0821-1 · DOI
- Min BS, 2013, Int J Softw Eng Appl, 7, 113
- 10.1017/S0960129512000783 · DOI
- 10.1179/136821910X12863757400240 · DOI
- 10.1109/97.995823 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TPAMI.2011.148 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11263-014-0727-3 · DOI
- 10.1109/TIP.2015.2478407 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Comprehensive Review of Blind Deconvolution Techniques for Image Deblurring
Satish, P., Srikantaswamy, M., & Ramaswamy, N. (2020) · Traitement du signal · doi:10.18280/ts.370321 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Mohd Shapri, A. H., & Abdullah, M. Z.
- Affiliations
- School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Nibong Tebal, Penang, Malaysia
- Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY)
- Corresponding author
- Abdullah, Mohd Zaid
- ORCID
- Abdullah, Mohd Zaid
- Venue
- The Imaging Science Journal
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-07-12
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 327-348
- ISSN
- 1368-2199 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-131X
- OpenAlex
- W2735509631
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2023: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 0.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Imaging Science Journal (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- RUI
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Image Processing Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Video Quality Assessment
- Keywords
- point spread function estimation, blind deconvolution, image deblurring, image segmentation, computational efficiency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accurate retrieval of region of interest for estimating point spread function and image deblurring. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13682199.2017.1341457
- The paper
- Mohd Shapri, A. H., & Abdullah, M. Z. (2017). Accurate retrieval of region of interest for estimating point spread function and image deblurring. The Imaging Science Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/13682199.2017.1341457