Can results of the Aging Males' Symptoms (AMS) scale predict those of screening scales for androgen deficiency?
Open accessAbstract
INTRODUCTION: The Aging Male Symptoms' (AMS) scale was designed as a health-related quality of life (QoL) scale and standardized as a self-administered scale, first, to assess symptoms of aging (independent from those which are disease-related) between groups of males under different conditions, second, to evaluate the severity of symptoms/QoL over time, and, third, to measure changes pre- and post-androgen replacement therapy. The scale is in widespread use (17 languages currently available) and a recent review of methodological data documented good psychometric characteristics and ability as a clinical utility. This paper describes test characteristics of the AMS (positive and negative predictive values), taking two internationally established and published screening scales for androgen deficiency as the available standard. METHOD: A sample of 150 German males aged 40-69 years completed the AMS scale and two screening scales for androgen deficiency: the ADAM scale of Morley and colleagues and the screener of Smith and colleagues. The technique of a computer-assisted telephone interview was applied. RESULT: The comparison of the AMS with the two screening instruments for androgen deficiency showed sufficiently good compatibility despite conceptual differences. The AMS scale sufficiently predicted the results of the two screening instruments. A positive predictive value of 92% and a negative predictive value of 50% were found regarding the ADAM scale. The respective figures regarding Smith's screener were 65% and 49% for positive and negative predictive values, respectively. CONCLUSION: The AMS scale obviously measures a similar phenomenon as the two established and widely used screeners for androgen deficiency, although it was not developed as a screening instrument.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Heinemann and colleagues found significant similarities and compatibility among the AMS, ADAM, and MMAS instruments, with no scale superior.
“In comparing the AMS, ADAM, and MMAS questionnaires, Heinemann and colleagues noted significant similarities and compatibility among instruments, with no one scale demonstrating superiority.”
From Challenges in Testosterone Measurement, Data Interpretation, and Methodological Appraisal of Interventional Trials (2016) · cites this paper as [120]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 10 · Cited by 109
- Authors
- Heinemann, L., Saad, F., Heinemann, K., & Thai, D.
- Affiliations
- Berlin Center for Epidemiology and Health Research (DE)
- ORCID
- Saad, F
- Venue
- The Aging Male
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-09
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 211-218
- ISSN
- 1368-5538 (ISSN-L)
- 1473-0790
- OpenAlex
- W2145930340
- Cited by
- 109
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 4.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Aging Male (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal and reproductive studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
- Keywords
- androgen deficiency, male hypogonadism, screening tool, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, health-related quality of life, testosterone replacement therapy, older men
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aging, Androgens, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sensitivity and Specificity, Andropause
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review