The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cool, Creative and Egalitarian? Exploring Gender in Project-Based New Media Work in Euro
Open accessAbstract
The new media industries are popularly regarded as cool, creative and egalitarian. This view is held by academics, policy-makers and also by new media workers themselves, who cite the youth, dynamism and informality of new media as some of its main attractions. This paper is concerned with what this mythologized version of new media work leaves out, glosses over and, indeed, makes difficult to articulate at all. Themes include pervasive insecurity, low pay, and long hours but the particular focus of the paper is on gender inequalities in new media work. Despite its image as 'cool', non-hierarchical and egalitarian, the new media sector, this paper will argue, is characterized by a number of entrenched and all too old-fashioned patterns of gender inequality relating to education, access to work and pay. Moreover, a number of new forms of gender inequality are emerging, connected - paradoxically - to many of the features of the work that are valued - informality,autonomy,flexibility and so on. Drawing on a study of 125 freelance new media workers in six European countries, this paper explores these issues and argues that the new forms of sexism in new media represent a serious challenge to its image of itself as cool, diverse and egalitarian.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
White Women, Race Matters: The Social Construction of Whiteness
Frankenburg, R. (1993) · doi:10.4324/9780203973431 · Cited by 3,308
Cited by
In the Social Factory?: Immaterial Labour, Precariousness and Cultural Work
Gill, R., & Pratt, A. (2008) · Theory, Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/0263276408097794 · Cited by 1,361
Self-citationAgainst Meritocracy: Culture, power and myths of mobility
Littler, J. (2017) · doi:10.4324/9781315712802 · Cited by 347
Fuchs, C., & Sevignani, S. (2013) · tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society · doi:10.31269/triplec.v11i2.461 · Cited by 361
“…the precarious conditions under which they are often compelled to perform this work such as low income, long working hours followed by periods without work, insecurity, the individualization of risk and the difficulty of combining labour and family (Gill 2002, 2006, Hesmondhalgh and Baker 2011).”
Background‘Patches don’t have gender’: What is not open in open source software
Nafus, D. (2012) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444811422887 · Cited by 204
Alacovska, A., & Gill, R. (2019) · International Journal of Cultural Studies · doi:10.1177/1367877918821231 · Cited by 101
Self-citationPrison media work: from manual labor to the work of being tracked
Kaun, A., & Stiernstedt, F. (2020) · Media, Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/0163443719899809 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Gill, R.
- Venue
- Information, Communication & Society
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 70-89
- ISSN
- 1369-118X (ISSN-L)
- 1468-4462
- OpenAlex
- W2054693013
- Cited by
- 508
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.