The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Protest in an Information Society: a review of literature on social movements and new ICTs
Abstract
New Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) are changing the ways in which activists communicate, collaborate and demonstrate. Scholars from a wide range of disciplines, among them sociology, political science and communication, are working to understand these changes. The diversity of perspectives represented enriches the literature, providing an abundant repertoire of tools for examining these phenomena, but it is also an obstacle to understanding. Few works are commonly cited across the field, and most are known only within the confines of their discipline. The absence of a common set of organizing theoretical principles can make it difficult to find connections between these disparate works beyond their common subject matter. This paper responds by locating existing scholarship within a common framework for explaining the emergence, development and outcomes of social movement activity. This provides a logical structure that facilitates conversations across the field around common issues of concern, highlighting connections between scholars and research agendas that might otherwise be difficult to discern.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805431 · Cited by 5,558
Conceptual origins, current problems, future direction
McAdam, D. (1996) · Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511803987.003 · Cited by 974
Cited by
“Not this one”: social movements, the attention economy, and microcelebrity networked activism
Tufekci, Z. (2013) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764213479369 · Cited by 323
(2012) · Cited by 289
Partisan asymmetries in online political activity
Conover, M. D., Gonçalves, B., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2012) · EPJ Data Science · doi:10.1140/epjds6 · Cited by 234
Health promotion as activism: building community capacity to effect social change
Parker, A., Kantroo, V., Lee, H. R., Osornio, M., Sharma, M., & Grinter, R. (2012) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2207676.2207692 · Cited by 84
Can You Hear Me Now? How Communication Technology Affects Protest and Repression
Christensen, D., & Garfias, F. (2018) · Quarterly Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1561/100.00016129 · Cited by 72
Metadata
- Authors
- Kelly Garrett, R.
- Venue
- Information, Communication & Society
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-04
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 202-224
- ISSN
- 1369-118X (ISSN-L)
- 1468-4462
- OpenAlex
- W1995582724
- Cited by
- 782
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 34.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Protest in an Information Society: a review of literature on social movements and new ICTs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13691180600630773
- The paper
- Kelly Garrett, R. (2006). Protest in an Information Society: a review of literature on social movements and new ICTs. Information, Communication & Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180600630773
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.