The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The disability divide in internet access and use
Abstract
The increasing spread of the Internet holds much potential for enhancing opportunities for people with disabilities. However, scarce evidence exists to suggest that people with disabilities are, in fact, participating in these new developments. Will the spread of information technologies (IT) increase equality by offering opportunities for people with disabilities? Or will a growing reliance on IT lead to more inequality by leaving behind certain portions of the population including people with disabilities? In this paper, the authors draw on nationally representative data regarding Americans' Internet uses to (1) identify the extent to which people with disabilities are embracing use of the Internet; (2) how their use of the Internet compares with the Internet uses of the rest of the population; (3) how having a disability relates to and interacts with other social statuses (e.g. socioeconomic status, age, gender) with regard to Internet use; and (4) what explains these trends. They draw on representative data collected by the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Census of the United States to answer these questions. It is found that people with disabilities are less likely to live in households with computers, are less likely to use computers and are less likely to be online. However, once socioeconomic background is controlled for, it is found that people with hearing disabilities and those who have limited walking ability are not less likely to be Internet users. This research enables a deeper understanding of both the use of the Internet by people with disabilities and the spread of new IT more generally.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide
Norris, P. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139164887 · Cited by 2,921
Cited by
The Third-Level Digital Divide: Who Benefits Most from Being Online?
van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & Helsper, E. J. (2015) · Communication and Information Technologies Annual · doi:10.1108/s2050-206020150000010002 · Cited by 1,022
From internet access to internet skills: digital inequality among older adults
Hargittai, E., Piper, A. M., & Morris, M. R. (2019) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-018-0617-5 · Cited by 616
Self-citationInternet use among older Europeans: An analysis based on SHARE data
König, R., Seifert, A., & Doh, M. (2018) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-018-0609-5 · Cited by 363
Old Dogs, New Clicks: Digital Inequality in Skills and Uses among Older Adults
Hargittai, E., & Dobransky, K. (2017) · Canadian Journal of Communication · doi:10.22230/cjc.2017v42n2a3176 · Cited by 351
Self-citationJohansson, S., Gulliksen, J., & Gustavsson, C. (2021) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-020-00714-x · Cited by 224
Metadata
- Authors
- Dobransky, K., & Hargittai, E.
- Venue
- Information, Communication & Society
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 313-334
- ISSN
- 1369-118X (ISSN-L)
- 1468-4462
- OpenAlex
- W1995089493
- Cited by
- 471
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 28.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The disability divide in internet access and use. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13691180600751298
- The paper
- Dobransky, K., & Hargittai, E. (2006). The disability divide in internet access and use. Information, Communication & Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180600751298
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.