Cited by 70Cultural Identity and RepresentationMedia and Digital CommunicationMedia Studies and Communication

LIFE ON THE WIRE: Deconstructing race on the Internet

Brock, André·2009·Information, Communication & Society

Abstract

This paper focuses on the construction of racial identity online through the mediating influences of popular culture, old media, weblogs, and Internet users. This paper examines the production of race on the Internet by examining the elements that make up the weblog Freakonomics: the topic, the environment, the medium, and the users. Recent cyberculture research has called for Internet studies to integrate critical theories of race and culture into its analyses. The argument, which this paper seeks to extend, is for the increased recognition of the salience of race in understanding Web content and production. In examining the blog's structure, posts, and comments, I applied Omi and Winant's racial formation theory to the cultural representations and structural phenomena articulated with respect to themes of race, racial interactions, media, and geography. Omi and Winant argue that people interpret the meaning of race by framing it in social structures, and that conversely, recognizing the racial dimensions in social structures leads to interpretations of race. Accordingly, this paper examines interpretations of race in The Wire (a critically-acclaimed minority-led television show), the New York Times news website, the Freakonomics blog, and the Web-enabled audience of the three elements. The paper concludes by arguing for more use of critical race and theory in information studies research in order to understand how racial perspectives affect the presentation and interpretation of Internet content.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13691180802660628

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Race is a major axis around which algorithmic allocation of resources and representation is bound.

    “Race is a major axis around which algorithmic allocation of resources and representation is bound.”

    From Towards a critical race methodology in algorithmic fairness (2020) · cites this paper as [20]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 14 · Cited by 70

Authors
Brock, A.
Affiliations
University of Iowa (US)
Corresponding author
Brock, André
Venue
Information, Communication & Society
Published
2009-04
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
344-363
ISSN
  • 1369-118X (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-4462
OpenAlex
W1882344946
Cited by
70
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
29.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Information Communication & Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Cultural Identity and Representation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
Keywords
racial identity, The Wire, racial formation theory, critical race theory, blogs, popular culture, media and race, audience interpretation, information science

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review