The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The social power of algorithms
Open accessAbstract
This article explores the questions associated with what might be thought of as the social power of algorithms. The article, which introduces a special issue on the same topic, begins by reflecting on how we might approach algorithms from a social scientific perspective. The article is then split into two sections. The first deals with the issues that might be associated with an analysis of the power of the algorithms themselves. This section outlines a series of issues associated with the functionality of the algorithms and how these functions are powerfully deployed within social world. The second section then focuses upon the notion of the algorithm. In this section, the article argues that we need to look beyond the algorithms themselves, as a technical and material presence, to explore how the notion or concept of the algorithm is also an important feature of their potential power. In this section, it is suggested that we look at the way that notions of the algorithm are evoked as a part of broader rationalities and ways of seeing the world. Exploring the notion of the algorithm may enable us to see how algorithms also play a part in social ordering processes, both in terms of how the algorithm is used to promote certain visions of calculative objectivity and also in relation to the wider governmentalities that this concept might be used to open up.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“When professionals cannot analyze the reasoning behind AI decisions, they miss out on the learning process (Beer 2017), lacking opportunities to reflect on, deepen, or update their expertise (Beane 2019).”
From To Engage or Not to Engage with AI for Critical Judgments: How Professionals Deal with Opacity When Using AI for Medical Diagnosis (2022) · cites this paper as Beer 2017
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Beer (2017) noted that power is “operationalized through the algorithm, in that the algorithmic output cements, maintains or produces certain truths” (p.8) and users' understanding of the world is changed through their algorithmic interaction.”
From Expanding on the Frames: Making a Case for Algorithmic Literacy (2023) · cites this paper as Beer, 2017
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“While machine algorithms shape human actions, humans shape these algorithms through their actions, which create a recursive relationship (Beer, 2017).”
From Artificial Intelligence and Management: The Automation–Augmentation Paradox (2021) · cites this paper as Beer, 2017
In the citing paper
“The collective impact of algorithms has spurred discussions on the autonomy afforded to end users.(Ananny and Crawford 2018;Beer 2017;Taddeo and Floridi 2018b;Möller et al. 2018;Malhotra et al. 2018;Shin and Park 2019;Hauer 2019;Bauer and Dubljević 2020).”
From The ethics of algorithms: key problems and solutions (2022) · cites this paper as Beer 2017
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality
Burchell, G., Gordon, C., & Miller, P. J. (1991) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,178
Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature
McNeil, M., & Haraway, D. (1992) · Feminist Review · doi:10.2307/1395245 · Cited by 6,794
Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature.
Green, P. A., & Haraway, D. (1992) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2076334 · Cited by 5,437
How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics
Hayles, N. K. (1999) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226321394.001.0001 · Cited by 5,284
(2011) · Cited by 4,430
The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information
Pasquale, F. (2015) · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674736061 · Cited by 3,796
’Society Must Be Defended’: Lectures at the College de France
Coté, M. (2004) · Canadian Journal of Communication · doi:10.22230/cjc.2004v29n3a1488 · Cited by 2,511
How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature and Informatics
Tambling, J., & Hayles, N. K. (2001) · The Modern Language Review · doi:10.2307/3735725 · Cited by 2,153
The Data Revolution: Big Data, Open Data, Data Infrastructures & Their Consequences
Kitchin, R. (2014) · doi:10.4135/9781473909472 · Cited by 1,469 · cited 1×
“Here, we see the role of algorithms, as decision-making parts of code (see Beer, 2013, p. 65), as being analytic and decisive (for a discussion of the role of algorithms in data analytics, see Kitchin, 2014, pp. 100–112).”
MethodThe Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information
(2016) · Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.1177/0094306116641409c · Cited by 1,334
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Foucault M., 2002, Power: Essential works of Foucault 1954–1984
- Foucault M., 2014, On the government of the living: Lectures at the collège de France 1979–1980
- Thrift N., 2006, Knowing capitalism
- 10.1177/0162243915608948 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 939
New Digital Inequalities. Algorithms Divide
Ragnedda, M. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-49079-9_4 · Cited by 28
Understanding Digital Inequality: A Theoretical Kaleidoscope
Kühn, C., Khoo, S.-M., Czerniewicz, L., Lilley, W., Bute, S. J. R., Crean, A., Abegglen, S., Burns, T., Sinfield, S. F., Jandrić, P., et al. (2023) · Postdigital science and education · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-35411-3_17 · Cited by 27
Wang, X., & Cao, S. (2024) · The Journal of Chinese Sociology · doi:10.1186/s40711-024-00213-z · Cited by 41
“Algorithms, as the underlying technical architecture of platforms, become the standard by which content is sorted, information is matched, and traffic is allocated (Gillespie 2014; Beer 2017).”
BackgroundFrau‐Meigs, D. (2024) · Digital · doi:10.3390/digital4020026 · Cited by 30
“This competence-based approach indicated how algorithmic literacy could be integrated within a MIL design and curriculum, rather than seen as a separate literacy, following the familiarity principle that could bring adoption and implementation among teachers and educators [20].”
BackgroundLin, H. (2025) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051251313610 · Cited by 24
“…the existing discussion of folk theories and resistance behaviors to algorithms on various social media platforms, such as Facebook (Bucher, 2013, 2017; Rader & Gray, 2015), Instagram (Cotter, 2019), Spotify (Siles et al., 2020), Twitter, (DeVito et al., 2017), TikTok (Abidin, 2020; Lee et al.,…”
Algorithms and the narration of past selves
Jacobsen, B. N. (2022) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2020.1834603 · Cited by 24
“In the last decade, much attention has been given to analyse and conceptualise the social power of algorithms (Amoore & Raley, 2017; Beer, 2009, 2017; Bucher, 2018; Cheney-Lippold, 2011; Gillespie, 2016).”
BackgroundMaking the black box society transparent
Innerárity, D. (2021) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-020-01130-8 · Cited by 30
“The practices of transparency have no place in a social void (Beer 2017; Kemper and Kolkman 2018), nor are algorithms objects that are known through observation (Ziewitz 2017).”
BackgroundAlgorithmic Interactions in Open Source Work
Shaikh, M., & Vaast, E. (2022) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2022.1153 · Cited by 27
The Democratization of Artificial Intelligence
Sudmann, A. (2019) · AI critique · doi:10.14361/9783839447192 · Cited by 55
The Democratization of Artificial Intelligence
Sudmann, A. (2019) · transcript Verlag eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783839447192 · Cited by 23
Zhou, X., Zhou, Y., Gong, Y., Cai, Z., Qiu, A., Xiao, Q., Antle, A. N., & Bai, Z. (2024) · ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC) · doi:10.1145/3628516.3655802 · Cited by 25
Lv, X., Chen, Y., & Guo, W. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.859597 · Cited by 29
“…perspective, focusing on its structuring power (i.e., the structural limitations of data-tracking apps on user information access and platform use) (Beer, 2017; Ford, 2021; Morrison, 2021; Welch, 2021), little attention has been paid to the dynamic processes of how users encounter algorithm and…”
BackgroundRetractedRoots and fields: excursions through place, space, and local in hyperlocal media
Rodgers, S. (2017) · Media Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/0163443717729213 · Cited by 22
“While algorithms do often operate silently and unnoticed, evident here were degrees of awareness, reflexivity, and knowledge about the social power of algorithms (Beer, 2017) and digital presence in general (Couldry et al., 2016).”
BackgroundKategorisieren, Vergleichen, Bewerten und Quantifizieren im Spiegel sozialer Beobachtungsformate
Heintz, B. (2021) · KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie · doi:10.1007/s11577-021-00741-3 · Cited by 23
“Im Gegensatz zu vielen anderen Studien, die die „social power of algorithms“ (Beer 2017) den Algorithmen selbst zuschreiben, legen Büchner und Dosdall den Fokus auf den organisatorischen Kontext, in den sie eingebettet sind: Es ist ihre Einbindung in organisatorische Entscheidungsprozesse, die…”
BackgroundA place to stand: Digital sociology and the Archimedean effect
Possamai‐Inesedy, A., & Nixon, A. G. (2017) · Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1177/1440783317744104 · Cited by 21
“We are led, by algorithms and our own preference for the like-minded, into echo chambers or ‘filter bubbles’ (Pariser cited in Beer, 2017), where we find only the news we expect and the political perspectives we already hold dear.”
BackgroundInfluentialDigital assistants: Inequalities and social context of access, use, and perceptual understanding
Park, Y. J., Lee, H., Jones-Jang, S. M., & Oh, Y. W. (2022) · Poetics · doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2022.101689 · Cited by 21
Educational data advocates: emerging forms of teacher agency in postdigital classrooms
Arantes, J. A., & Buchanan, R. (2022) · Learning Media and Technology · doi:10.1080/17439884.2022.2087084 · Cited by 21
“Such in fl uencers can provide a greater understanding of how data has impact for their employment and as part of a broader infrastructure with social and cultural implications (Beer 2017).”
BackgroundFernàndez, A., & Barreiro, M. (2020) · Revista Contracampo · doi:10.22409/contracampo.v39i1.38404 · Cited by 18
“Algorithm decisions are seen as neutral and trustworthy, dismissing the social power of the technical systems (Beer, 2017).”
BackgroundNess, S., Singh, N., Volkivskyi, M., & Phia, W. J. (2024) · American Journal of Computing and Engineering · doi:10.47672/ajce.1878 · Cited by 22
Gawer, A., & Harracá, M. (2025) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2025.105300 · Cited by 23
Bilić, P. (2018) · tripleC Communication Capitalism & Critique Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society · doi:10.31269/triplec.v16i1.914 · Cited by 28
Discursive contestations of algorithms: a case study of recommendation platforms in China
Meng, J. (2021) · Chinese Journal of Communication · doi:10.1080/17544750.2021.1875491 · Cited by 20
“Platforms ’ discourses on algorithms “ promote a certain rationality ” that is based on “ the virtues of calculation, competition, efficiency, objectivity and the need to be strategic ” (Beer, 2017, p. 9).”
BackgroundInfluentialJørgensen, A. M., & Nissen, M. A. (2022) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517221125163 · Cited by 29
“This can ultimately reproduce and reinforce socially divisive categories, causing ethical problems and harm (Beer, 2017; Boyd and Crawford, 2012; Bozdag, 2013; Chandler and Fuchs, 2019; Dutton and Kraemer, 1980; Eubanks, 2018; Noble, 2018; O ’ Neil, 2017; Tolan et al., 2019).”
BackgroundNavigating Artificial Intelligence, Public Relations and Race
Logan, N., & Waymer, D. (2024) · Journal of Public Relations Research · doi:10.1080/1062726x.2024.2308868 · Cited by 20
“(Beer, 2017).”
Organized Futures. On the Ambiguity of the Digital Absorption of Uncertainty
Wendt, T. G. (2021) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2021.554336 · Cited by 20
“On the operational level, calculation-based connectivity makes person-bound potentials such as experience-based intuition, moment-dependent perceptual ability, or case-based application knowledge super fl uous (Beer 2017).”
BackgroundBilić, P. (2018) · tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society · doi:10.31269/vol16iss1pp315-331 · Cited by 20
Algorithmic agencing in platform markets
Wei, R., & Geiger, S. (2024) · Marketing Theory · doi:10.1177/14705931241275558 · Cited by 20
“This feature implies that we don ’ t “ see ” algorithms as lines of code, but only encounter them indirectly as they integrate into daily routines (Beer, 2017).”
InfluentialAlgorithmic tyranny: Psycho-Pass , science fiction and the criminological imagination
Wood, M. A. (2018) · Crime Media Culture An International Journal · doi:10.1177/1741659018774609 · Cited by 31
Prospectus and limitations of algorithmic governance: an ecological evaluation of algorithmic trends
Shin, D., Fotiadis, A., & Yu, H. (2019) · Digital Policy Regulation and Governance · doi:10.1108/dprg-03-2019-0017 · Cited by 19
Digital first personality: Automation and influence within evolving media ecologies
Hutchinson, J. P. (2019) · Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies · doi:10.1177/1354856519858921 · Cited by 19
“The field of Critical Algorithm Studies has been occupied with exploring the role algorithms and automation have on our everyday lives (Anderson, 2011; Beer, 2009, 2017; Gillespie, 2016).”
BackgroundElectronic personhood for artificial intelligence in the workplace
Nowik, P. (2021) · Computer law & security review · doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105584 · Cited by 29
Carbon-Responsive Computing: Changing the Nexus between Energy and Computing
Nafus, D., Schooler, E. M., & Burch, K. A. (2021) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en14216917 · Cited by 21
“Data’s Power to Create Social Realities Those who design data systems have the power to create their own social realities [92,98].”
BackgroundThe neo-fascist discourse and its normalisation through mediation
Cammaerts, B. (2020) · Journal of Multicultural Discourses · doi:10.1080/17447143.2020.1743296 · Cited by 22
“Social media and their opaque proprietary algorithms have, furthermore, the propensity to regulate how information circulates and who gets to see what (Beer, 2017).”
BackgroundForegrounding Algorithms: Preparing Users for Co-design with Sensitizing Activities
Alvarado, O., Storms, E., Geerts, D., & Verbert, K. (2020) · Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3419249.3421237 · Cited by 19
“Similarly, other researchers have advocated the study of those algorithms that semi-autonomously exert power without supervision from human counterparts [3, 32].”
BackgroundYuan, Y.-P., Liu, L., Tan, G. W., & Ooi, K. (2024) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2024.102188 · Cited by 21
People-based marketing and the cultural economies of attribution metrics
Smith, H. (2019) · Journal of Cultural Economics · doi:10.1080/17530350.2019.1570538 · Cited by 15
“…also becomes a euphemism for the intensification of data extraction and analysis for accelerated forms of governance over the production process (Beer 2017b), such as through analytical processes that can track and predict consumer behavior and associated consumer patterns that directly…”
BackgroundThe Servitization of Australian K-12 Educational Settings
Arantes, J. A. (2020) · Postdigital Science and Education · doi:10.1007/s42438-019-00097-0 · Cited by 18
“This, in turn, enabled the platforms to make personalized recommendations on courses and nudge interest via push notifications (Beer 2017).”
BackgroundArantes, J. A. (2022) · The Australian Educational Researcher · doi:10.1007/s13384-022-00530-7 · Cited by 18
“Firstly, seemingly objective predictions using big data have been shown to perpetuate social inequality in the form of data-driven insights and recommendations (Beer, 2017; Crawford & Paglen, 2019).”
BackgroundMethodGaming Algorithmic Hate-Speech Detection: Stakes, Parties, and Moves
Haapoja, J., Laaksonen, S.-M., & Lampinen, A. (2020) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305120924778 · Cited by 19
“This resonates with prior research on power asymmetries between different stakeholders in relation to algorithmic systems (Beer, 2017).”
BackgroundRauchfleisch, A., & Metag, J. (2020) · Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies · doi:10.1386/ajms_00021_1 · Cited by 17
Search engines and the sex education information practices of LGBTQ + youth
Delmonaco, D., Marcu, G. M., & Haimson, O. L. (2020) · Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/pra2.364 · Cited by 18
“User perceptions of search algorithms can change their interactions with them (Beer, 2017).”
BackgroundHarju, A. A., & Huhtamäki, J. (2021) · International Review of Sociology · doi:10.1080/03906701.2021.1947951 · Cited by 18
“In the context of digital media platforms, this is seen in the interlinkage of algorithms and the rise of ‘trending’ hashtags or dissemination of violent content, where the promotion of certain content over others (Gillespie, 2014) also shapes our social reality (e.g. Beer, 2017).”
BackgroundCognitive Technologies – Are We in Danger of Humanizing Machines and Dehumanizing Humans?
Marszałek-Kotzur, I. (2022) · Management Systems in Production Engineering · doi:10.2478/mspe-2022-0034 · Cited by 18
Bonini, T., & Gandini, A. (2019) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/zp4wx · Cited by 18
Boullier, H., Kotras, B., & Siles, I. (2021) · RESET · doi:10.4000/reset.2698 · Cited by 17
Toward building a fair peer recommender to support help-seeking in online learning
Li, C., Xing, W., & Leite, W. L. (2022) · Distance Education · doi:10.1080/01587919.2021.2020619 · Cited by 20
“Algorithmic biases are unwanted behaviors of algorithms that embed the hidden values of humans (Beer, 2017).”
BackgroundEmotion-based Stereotypes in Image Analysis Services
Kyriakou, K., Kleanthous, S., Otterbacher, J., & Papadopoulos, G. A. (2020) · ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (UMAP) · doi:10.1145/3386392.3399567 · Cited by 17
“Beer emphasizes that algorithms are able to influence and convince people, and describes how they became widely trusted for their precision and objectivity [3].”
BackgroundAlgorithms as complementary abstractions
Matzner, T. (2022) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448221078604 · Cited by 22
Automated mobilities: From weaponized drones to killer bots
Elliott, A. (2018) · Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1177/1440783318811777 · Cited by 18
Smith, H. (2017) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2017.1397726 · Cited by 16
“As this nascent body of research into data analytics industries continues (Beer, 2017b), it is important to further understand the role location data will play in mediating the economic relationships between users, platforms, and analytics industries into ecologies of location (Wilken, 2015).”
BackgroundInfluentialPoulain, R., & Tarissan, F. (2019) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2019.102169 · Cited by 18
“Consequently, this increasing use of digital platforms and their recommendation systems has led the scientific community to focus on the impact of algorithmic decisions on users’ behavior [2, 13, 14, 15, 16].”
BackgroundLarsen, B. C. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society · doi:10.1145/3461702.3462591 · Cited by 20
“through surveillance, online interaction, and so on [33, 37].”
BackgroundHelm, P., & Matzner, T. (2023) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448231165916 · Cited by 22
“Unanticipated machine learning dynamics, whose unfolding is often much more difficult to fathom, can also play a critical role here (Beer, 2017).”
The Logic of the Synthetic Supplement in Algorithmic Societies
Jacobsen, B. N. (2024) · Theory Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/02632764231225768 · Cited by 16
“It is claimed that if additional data cannot be extracted from society then they can be algorithmically generated, adding a further dimension to the social power of algorithms (Beer, 2017; Bucher, 2018).”
Exposed or Erased: Algorithmic Censorship of Nudity in Art
Riccio, P., Hofmann, T., & Oliver, N. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642586 · Cited by 18
Monteiro-Krebs, L., Alvarado, O., Dewitte, P., Ausloos, J., Geerts, D., Naudts, L., & Verbert, K. (2019) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3290607.3312808 · Cited by 16
Dickel, S. (2022) · Berliner Journal für Soziologie · doi:10.1007/s11609-022-00475-9 · Cited by 20
“Die Diskussion um den Einfluss von Algorithmen auf die Strukturierung sozialer Beziehungen und der Filterung der gesellschaftlichen Welt zeigen, dass der immer weitgehendere Einbau solcher Systeme in die Gesellschaft dieser mitunter unheimlich erscheint (Beer 2017).”
BackgroundExpanding on the Frames: Making a Case for Algorithmic Literacy
Loyola Marymount University, & Archambault, S. (2023) · Communications in Information Literacy · doi:10.15760/comminfolit.2023.17.2.11 · Cited by 19
Marjanovic, O., Cecez-Kecmanovic, D., & Vidgen, R. (2018) · IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-04091-8_4 · Cited by 15
“As we have shown, in addition to investigating the design of algorithms (that has been extensively studied in the literature, see [18, 43], researching and understanding algorithmic pollution requires empirical examination of interrelated sociomaterial practices of two key aspects: algorithm…”
Ernst, J. (2024) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2024.2382224 · Cited by 15
“Algorithmic recommender systems are closely intertwined with commercial interests (Beer, 2017), reflect dominant social categories (Benjamin, 2019; Bucher, 2018; Noble, 2018), and can shape how users construct reality (Just & Lat-zer, 2017).”
Exploring Algorithmic Resistance: Responses to Social Media Censorship in Activism
Elmimouni, H., Rüller, S., Aal, K., Skop, Y., Abokhodair, N., Wulf, V., & Tolmie, P. (2025) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3710970 · Cited by 32
The Ethics of Computational Social Science
Leslie, D. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-16624-2_4 · Cited by 18
Algorithmic Accountability in Context. Socio-Technical Perspectives on Structural Causal Models
Poechhacker, N., & Kacianka, S. (2021) · Frontiers in Big Data · doi:10.3389/fdata.2020.519957 · Cited by 19
“As such, the power of algorithms and how to deal with these entities has become a major point of discussion (Ziewitz, 2016; Beer, 2017) — even creating its own fi eld of critical algorithm studies (e.g., Gillespie, 2014; Seaver, 2018).”
BackgroundHepp, A. (2021) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783110627275-015 · Cited by 15
Uncertain Knowledge. Studying “Truth” and “Conspiracies” in the Digital Age
Boullier, H., Kotras, B., & Siles, I. (2021) · RESET · doi:10.4000/reset.2750 · Cited by 15
Recommender Systems and Over-the-Top Services: A Systematic Review Study (2010–2022)
Vicente, P. N., & Burnay, C. D. (2024) · Journalism and Media · doi:10.3390/journalmedia5030080 · Cited by 10
“…Gillespie and Seaver 2016; Kitchin 2017; Bucher 2018), the rationality they internalize (Lowrie 2017), the cultural and social power they embody (Striphas 2015; Dourish 2016; Beer 2017), and the normativities (Lee and Björklund Larsen 2019) and automation anxieties (Goffey 2019) they instate.”
Judging in the Dark: How Delivery Riders Form Fairness Perceptions Under Algorithmic Management
Xiang, Y., Du, J., zheng, X., Long, L., & Xie, H. Y. (2024) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-024-05883-w · Cited by 17
“None-theless, different definitions generally revolve around the concept of algorithmic bias, which occurs when algorithms reflect the implicit values of those involved in coding, programming, and training (Beer, 2017).”
Verwiebe, R., Buder, C., Weissmann, S., Osorio-Krauter, C., & Philipp, A. (2024) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448241307931 · Cited by 19
“Thus, algorithmic systems are highly integrated into the social fabric as they evaluate, sort, rank, recommend, decide on their own, and exercise power (Beer, 2017; Davis, 2023; Lupton, 2016).”
Shin, D., & Ahsan, A. (2025) · Journal of Media Business Studies · doi:10.1080/16522354.2025.2509060 · Cited by 14
“A platform algorithm can be fair if the displayed results are neutral to user input, such as the traits of the individual (i.e. race, gender, disability, etc.), which should not correlate with the outcome (Beer, 2017).”
RetractedLiel, Y., & Zalmanson, L. (2025) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2025.2561390 · Cited by 14
“…they have the potential to reduce overreliance by focusing on informative explanations rather than convincing ones, they may some-times inadvertently increase overreliance, for example, due to inflating users’ confidence in the AI, confirmation bias, or the illusion of explanatory depth [11, 70].”
Iapaolo, F. (2023) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-022-01590-0 · Cited by 15
“Training datasets play a vital role in determining what SDCs can see and how they behave , even more so than the algorithms that govern the vehicle’s behavior in real time (see Beer 2017 on the social power of algorithms).”
BackgroundEthical Implications of Generative AI in Art and the Media
Vyas, B. (2022) · International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research · doi:10.36948/ijfmr.2022.v04i04.9392 · Cited by 16
“ChatGPT says no”: agency, trust, and blame in Twitter discourses after the launch of ChatGPT
Heaton, D., Nichele, E., Clos, J., & Fischer, J. E. (2024) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-023-00414-1 · Cited by 22
Constructing Envelopes: How Institutional Custodians Can Tame Disruptive Algorithms
Marti, E., Lawrence, T. B., & Steele, C. W. J. (2024) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2019.1343 · Cited by 16
de Oliveira, T. M. (2018) · Matrizes · doi:10.11606/issn.1982-8160.v12i3p101-126 · Cited by 19
Yuan, Y., Shi, Y., Ti, S. U., & Zhang, H. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1563592 · Cited by 19
“Beer (2017) indicated that the concept of algorithms can play a powerful role in shaping decisions and influencing behavior, thereby constituting social power and discursive status.”
Mead, G., & Neves, B. B. (2022) · The Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/00380261221105380 · Cited by 13
Digital Technologies for the Future of the Water Sector? Examining the Discourse on Digital Water
Walter, C. (2023) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2023.103918 · Cited by 13
“Hence, Beer (2017) argues that algorithms should not be viewed as a separate object existing outside a social context, but rather as a product of diverse social forces.”
BackgroundInfluential“The revolution will not be supervised”: Consent and open secrets in data science
Carrigan, C. M., Green, M. W., & Rahman-Davies, A. (2021) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517211035673 · Cited by 17
“For example, the Information Technology Industry (ITI) Council (2017), a lobbying group for Amazon, Facebook, and Google, warned lawmakers to “ keep their hands off their algorithms ” (De Vynck and Brody, 2017).”
BackgroundЦифровые инфраструктуры гражданско-политического активизма: актуальные вызовы, риски и ограничения
Volodenkov, S. V., & Fedorchenko, S. N. (2021) · Monitoring obŝestvennogo mneniâ: èkonomičeskie i socialʹnye peremeny · doi:10.14515/monitoring.2021.6.2014 · Cited by 14
The Debate on the Ethics of AI in Health Care: a Reconstruction and Critical ReviewPreprint
Morley, J. (2019) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/n7y2g · Cited by 12
“As (Beer, 2017) attests, when thinking about the power of an algorithm, we need to think beyond the impact and consequences of the code, to the powerful ways in which notions and ideas about the algorithm circulate throughout the social world.”
BackgroundBester, M., & Stander, E. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-63864-1_10 · Cited by 13
Chiappetta, A. (2023) · Internet Policy Review · doi:10.14763/2023.4.1733 · Cited by 15
Li, A. K. (2024) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448231221238 · Cited by 17
Economizing education: Assessment algorithms and calculative agencies
O’Keeffe, C. (2017) · E-Learning and Digital Media · doi:10.1177/2042753017732503 · Cited by 12
“Algorithms are depicted as neutral, efficient, objective, and trustworthy (Beer, 2017) and the data they produced as correspondingly value-free or objective.”
Background“I Really Don’t Know What ‘Thumbs Up’ Means”: Algorithmic Experience in Movie Recommender Algorithms
Alvarado, O., Abeele, V. V., Geerts, D., & Verbert, K. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-29387-1_30 · Cited by 16
Die Versprechen von Big Data im Spiegel feministischer Rationalitätskritik
Prietl, B. (2019) · GENDER – Zeitschrift für Geschlecht Kultur und Gesellschaft · doi:10.3224/gender.v11i3.02 · Cited by 12
Data politics on the move: intimate work from the inside of a data-driven health system
Cruz, T. M. (2021) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2021.1954972 · Cited by 13
“The generation of data sources through routine technological use – a process van Dijck (2014) refers to as ‘ data fi cation ’ – has in turn led to new questions of how data and technology are implicated with politics and power (Beer, 2017; Pasquale, 2015).”
BackgroundMethodIn data we (don't) trust: The public adrift in data-driven public opinion models
Splichal, S. (2022) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517221097319 · Cited by 12
“This requires studying how algorithms are part of broader rationalities, programmes of social change and development, and part of power dynamics (Beer, 2017: 9).”
BackgroundThe Nexus between Methods and Power in Sociological Research
Schmitz, A., & Hamann, J. (2022) · The American Sociologist · doi:10.1007/s12108-022-09537-0 · Cited by 12
“…and evaluation; for how they govern, control, and sort people; for disproportionately representing and ‘visibilizing’ groups and whole populations; for (re-)producing social inequalities; and, ultimately, for contributing to a ‘neoliberal agenda’ (O’Neil, 2016; Neyland & Möllers, 2017; Beer, 2017).”
BackgroundThe Netflix Experience : A User-Focused Approach to the Netflix Recommendation Algorithm
Varela, D. R., & Kaun, A. (2019) · KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) · Cited by 12
A Study on the Modeling of Major Factors for the Principles of AI Ethics
Lim, J. H., & Kwon, H.-Y. (2021) · Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research · doi:10.1145/3463677.3463733 · Cited by 12
“In other words, "Fairness" is associated with algorithmic bias and occurs when it reflects implicit human values involved in programming, coding, to learn algorithms [27].”
BackgroundKasapoğlu, T., Masso, A., & Calzati, S. (2021) · Digital Geography and Society · doi:10.1016/j.diggeo.2021.100016 · Cited by 13
Efe, A. (2022) · Yeni Medya Dergisi · doi:10.55609/yenimedya.1146586 · Cited by 12
Misra, R. R., Kapoor, S., & Sanjeev, M. A. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3970797/v1 · Cited by 12
Making Sense of Responsibility: A Semio-Ethic Perspective on TikTok’s Algorithmic Pluralism
Scalvini, M. (2023) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051231180625 · Cited by 15
“Therefore, a theoretical approach driven by a “semio-ethic” perspective (Petrilli, 2016, 2017) might facilitate better analysis and design of algorithmic recommendation systems.”
BackgroundAlgorithmic policing accountability: eight sociotechnical challenges
Wessels, M. (2023) · Policing & Society · doi:10.1080/10439463.2023.2241965 · Cited by 14
“This is a conceptual de fi ciency as policing algorithms that fall under the same conceptual umbrella (e.g. facial recognition systems, predictive policing systems) can have di ff erent e ff ects in practice due to their technical designs and applications (Beer 2017, Kitchin 2017).”
Резаев, А. В., & Трегубова, Н. Д. (2023) · Monitoring obŝestvennogo mneniâ: èkonomičeskie i socialʹnye peremeny · doi:10.14515/monitoring.2023.3.2384 · Cited by 11
Gausen, A., Mitra, B., & Lindley, S. E. (2024) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3630106.3658900 · Cited by 18
A generalized evolutionary metaheuristic (GEM) algorithm for engineering optimization
Yang, X. (2024) · Cogent Engineering · doi:10.1080/23311916.2024.2364041 · Cited by 11
“Algorithms have been important through history (Beer, 2016; Chabert, 1999; Schrijver, 2005).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Beer, D.
- Affiliations
- University of York (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Beer, David
- ORCID
- Beer, David
- Venue
- Information, Communication & Society
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-08-08
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-13
- ISSN
- 1369-118X (ISSN-L)
- 1468-4462
- OpenAlex
- W2507975203
- Cited by
- 945
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 196 · 2025: 91 · 2024: 101 · 2023: 157 · 2022: 99 · 2021: 108 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 69 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 15
- FWCI
- 104.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Information Communication & Society (publishedVersion)
- White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Keywords
- algorithms, social power, social ordering, governmentality, rationality, algorithmic governance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review