Mapping the anti-vaccination movement on Facebook
Abstract
Over the past decade, anti-vaccination rhetoric has become part of the mainstream discourse regarding the public health practice of childhood vaccination. These utilise social media to foster online spaces that strengthen and popularise anti-vaccination discourses. In this paper, we examine the characteristics of and the discourses present within six popular anti-vaccination Facebook pages. We examine these large-scale datasets using a range of methods, including social network analysis, gender prediction using historical census data, and generative statistical models for topic analysis (Latent Dirichlet allocation). We find that present-day discourses centre around moral outrage and structural oppression by institutional government and the media, suggesting a strong logic of ‘conspiracy-style’ beliefs and thinking. Furthermore, anti-vaccination pages on Facebook reflect a highly ‘feminised’ movement ‒ the vast majority of participants are women. Although anti-vaccination networks on Facebook are large and global in scope, the comment activity sub-networks appear to be ‘small world’. This suggests that social media may have a role in spreading anti-vaccination ideas and making the movement durable on a global scale.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 30 · Cited by 351
- Authors
- Smith, N., & Graham, T.
- Affiliations
- Federation University (AU)
- Research School of Computer Science, and Research School of Social Science, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
- Corresponding author
- Smith, Naomi
- ORCID
- Smith, Naomi
- Venue
- Information, Communication & Society
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-12-27
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1310-1327
- ISSN
- 1369-118X (ISSN-L)
- 1468-4462
- OpenAlex
- W2780896111
- Cited by
- 351
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 67 · 2021: 86 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 7
- FWCI
- 43.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Information Communication & Society (publishedVersion)
- QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
- FedUni ResearchOnline (Federation University Australia) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
- Keywords
- anti-vaccine movement, Facebook, online discourse, conspiracy beliefs, childhood immunization, small-world networks, moral outrage, institutional oppression
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review