Cited by 351Misinformation and Its ImpactsSocial Media and PoliticsVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy

Mapping the anti-vaccination movement on Facebook

Smith, Naomi, Graham, Tim·2019·Information, Communication & Society

Abstract

Over the past decade, anti-vaccination rhetoric has become part of the mainstream discourse regarding the public health practice of childhood vaccination. These utilise social media to foster online spaces that strengthen and popularise anti-vaccination discourses. In this paper, we examine the characteristics of and the discourses present within six popular anti-vaccination Facebook pages. We examine these large-scale datasets using a range of methods, including social network analysis, gender prediction using historical census data, and generative statistical models for topic analysis (Latent Dirichlet allocation). We find that present-day discourses centre around moral outrage and structural oppression by institutional government and the media, suggesting a strong logic of ‘conspiracy-style’ beliefs and thinking. Furthermore, anti-vaccination pages on Facebook reflect a highly ‘feminised’ movement ‒ the vast majority of participants are women. Although anti-vaccination networks on Facebook are large and global in scope, the comment activity sub-networks appear to be ‘small world’. This suggests that social media may have a role in spreading anti-vaccination ideas and making the movement durable on a global scale.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1369118x.2017.1418406

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 30 · Cited by 351

Authors
Smith, N., & Graham, T.
Affiliations
  • Federation University (AU)
  • Research School of Computer Science, and Research School of Social Science, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
Corresponding author
Smith, Naomi
Venue
Information, Communication & Society
Published
2017-12-27
Volume
22
Issue
9
Pages
1310-1327
ISSN
  • 1369-118X (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-4462
OpenAlex
W2780896111
Cited by
351
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 67 · 2021: 86 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 7
FWCI
43.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Information Communication & Society (publishedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
  • FedUni ResearchOnline (Federation University Australia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Keywords
anti-vaccine movement, Facebook, online discourse, conspiracy beliefs, childhood immunization, small-world networks, moral outrage, institutional oppression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review