Cited by 38Populism, Right-Wing MovementsSocial Media and PoliticsMisinformation and Its Impacts

Social media use and support for populist radical right parties: assessing exposure and selection effects in a two-wave panel study

Schumann, Sandy, Boer, Diana, Hanke, Katja, Liu, James·2021·Information, Communication & Society

Abstract

Vote shares for populist radical right parties (PRRPs) have increased considerably in recent years, and this advancement of PRRPs has been attributed in part to social media. We assess the affinity between social media and populist radical right parties by examining a) whether more frequent social media use for news enhances the willingness to vote for a PRRP (exposure effect) as well as b) whether individuals who have voted for a PRRP in the past use social media more frequently to access news (selection effect). To address these research questions, we analysed data of a two-wave survey study that was conducted in Germany, focusing on the party Alternative for Germany (AfD). Binary logistic regression highlighted that social media use increased the likelihood of supporting the AfD. Pre-registered multinominal analyses, however, showed that this effect was driven by specific party comparisons. That is, using the AfD as a reference category, social media use reduced intentions to vote for parties that expressed similar positions as the AfD on the issue of immigration and with which the PRRP competes over votes. Social media selection effects were not supported.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1369118x.2019.1668455

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schumann, S., Boer, D., Hanke, K., & Liu, J.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Universität Koblenz (DE)
  • GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences (DE)
  • Massey University (NZ)
Corresponding author
Schumann, Sandy
Venue
Information, Communication & Society
Published
2019-10-05
Volume
24
Issue
7
Pages
921-940
ISSN
  • 1369-118X (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-4462
OpenAlex
W2977735717
Cited by
38
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4
FWCI
16.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Information Communication & Society (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Massey University in New Zealand
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
Keywords
social media use, populist radical right parties, Alternative für Deutschland, vote choice, exposure effects, selection effects, news consumption, immigration attitudes, party competition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review