CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 0Social Work Education and PracticeSocial Sciences and PoliciesDutch Social and Cultural Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Editorial

Open access
Devlieghere, Jochen, Roose, Rudi·2020·European Journal of Social Work
DOI 10.1080/13691457.2020.1726631
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

As a journal, the European Journal of Social Work provides a forum for the social professions in all parts of Europe and beyond which critically analyse international developments in social work, s...

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13691457.2020.1726631

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Devlieghere, J., & Roose, R.
Affiliations
Ghent University (BE)
Corresponding author
  • Devlieghere, Jochen
  • Roose, Rudi
ORCID
Venue
European Journal of Social Work
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2020-03-03
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
189-190
ISSN
  • 1369-1457 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2664
DOI
10.1080/13691457.2020.1726631
OpenAlex
W4247615795
Cited by
0
References
0
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Social Work (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Social Work Education and Practice
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Social Sciences and Policies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Dutch Social and Cultural Studies
Keywords
social work, social professions, critical analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review