The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Analysis of the dermatophyte species isolated in the British Isles between 1980 and 2005 and review of worldwide dermatophyte trends over the last three decades
Abstract
Infections of the skin, hair and nails by dermatophyte fungi are common in developed and developing countries alike. However, the species involved and the resulting clinical entities vary both geographically and with time. We have surveyed 15,333 dermatophytes obtained from primary isolations at the Mycology Reference Laboratory, Bristol, UK from 1980 through 2005. Several striking trends in dermatophyte prevalence were apparent over this period. The relative frequencies of isolations of Microsporum canis (cat and dog ringworm), Trichophyton verrucosum (cattle ringworm), T. mentagrophytes var. mentagrophytes (rodent ringworm) and Epidermophyton floccosum (a cause of human groin and foot infections) all decreased by 90%. Conversely, the contributions of T. tonsurans and T. violaceum (two anthropophilic scalp-infecting species) to total dermatophyte isolations increased by 1000% over the same period. Finally, T. rubrum and T. mentagrophytes var. interdigitale, the two common causes of foot infection comprised 80% of all dermatophytes isolated in 1980 and 90% of isolations in 2005. Similar trends in dermatophyte prevalence were evidenced throughout the British Isles, based on the voluntary reporting of isolations from a large number of British laboratories at 5-yearly intervals over the same period. The implications of these changing patterns of dermatophyte species, and the clinical entities they produce are discussed in the context of a review of worldwide dermatophyte isolations over the last three decades, with emphasis on the causal agents of tinea capitis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Chermette, R., Ferreiro, L., & Guillot, J. (2008) · Mycopathologia · doi:10.1007/s11046-008-9102-7 · Cited by 330
The Changing Face of Dermatophytic Infections Worldwide
Zhan, P., & Liu, W. (2017) · Mycopathologia · doi:10.1007/s11046-016-0082-8 · Cited by 267
Dermatophytes and dermatophytosis in the eastern and southern parts of Africa
Nweze, E. I., & Eke, I. E. (2018) · Medical Mycology · doi:10.1093/mmy/myx025 · Cited by 100
Panackal, A. A., Halpern, E. F., & Watson, A. J. (2009) · International Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-4632.2009.04025.x · Cited by 63
Gao, Y., Zhan, P., Hagen, F., Menken, S. B. J., Sun, J., Rezaei‐Matehkolaei, A., & de Hoog, S. (2019) · Mycoses · doi:10.1111/myc.12889 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Borman, A. M., Campbell, C. K., Fraser, M., & Johnson, E. M.
- Venue
- Medical Mycology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 131-141
- ISSN
- 0268-1218 (ISSN-L)
- 1369-3786
- 1460-2709
- OpenAlex
- W2157141397
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of the dermatophyte species isolated in the British Isles between 1980 and 2005 and review of worldwide dermatophyte trends over the last three decades. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13693780601070107
- The paper
- Borman, A. M., Campbell, C. K., Fraser, M., & Johnson, E. M. (2007). Analysis of the dermatophyte species isolated in the British Isles between 1980 and 2005 and review of worldwide dermatophyte trends over the last three decades. Medical Mycology. https://doi.org/10.1080/13693780601070107
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.