Cited by 32Menopause: Health Impacts and TreatmentsComplementary and Alternative Medicine StudiesPhytoestrogen effects and research

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of Schisandra chinensis for menopausal symptoms

Park, J. Y., Kim, K. H.·2016·Climacteric

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this clinical trial was to evaluate the effectiveness of a natural extract from Schisandra chinensis for relief of various menopausal symptoms. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted from January 1, 2014 until January 13, 2015. We recruited women between the ages of 40 and 70 years who complained of menopausal symptoms measured by the Kupperman Index (KI). Patients were randomly assigned to treatment with either an extract from Schisandra chinensis (BMO-30) or placebo. They received the treatment for 6 weeks and were followed for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the mean interval change in KI score from baseline to week 12. Secondary measures included laboratory studies and the Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) score for sexual and bladder problems. RESULTS: Forty-one patients were considered eligible for enrolment, and 36 completed the study. After screening and randomization, patients were categorized into the placebo group (n = 18) and the BMO-30 group (n = 18). Total KI scores were significantly lower in the BMO-30 group than in the placebo group when evaluated with respect to group and time (p = 0.042). CONCLUSIONS: BMO-30 from Schisandra chinensis can be a safe and effective complementary medicine for menopausal symptoms, especially for hot flushes, sweating, and heart palpitations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13697137.2016.1238453

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The intake of Schisandra chinensis is not associated with serious side effects.

    “The intake of Schisandra chinensis is not associated with serious side effects [105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116].”

    From Plant Adaptogens—History and Future Perspectives (2021) · cites this paper as [106]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 63 · Cited by 32

Authors
Park, J. Y., & Kim, K. H.
Affiliations
Kangbuk Samsung Hospital (KR)
Corresponding author
Kim, K. H.
Venue
Climacteric
Published
2016-10-20
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
574-580
ISSN
  • 1369-7137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-0804
OpenAlex
W2539427208
Cited by
32
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Climacteric (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Seoul National University Open Repository (Seoul National University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Phytoestrogen effects and research
Keywords
Schisandra chinensis, menopausal symptoms, Kupperman index, Menopause Rating Scale, hot flashes, complementary therapy, plant extracts, women's health
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Complementary Therapies, Double-Blind Method, Drugs, Chinese Herbal, Female, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Phytotherapy, Menopause, Middle Aged, Placebos, Plant Extracts, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sweating, Treatment Outcome, Hot Flashes, Schisandra

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review