The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
Winning ‘Hearts and Minds’? A Critical Analysis of Counter-Insurgency Operations in Afghanistan
Abstract
This article conducts a critical analysis of the historical lessons, the assumptions and the conduct of ‘hearts and minds’ approaches to counter-insurgency. This results in challenges. Theoretically the ‘hearts and minds’ approach is rooted in modernisation theory and a normative Western approach to legitimacy that fails to live up to the expectations of the local population. The approach is also based on lessons from past successes such as the British 1950s campaign in Malaya. However, a great contextual shift has taken place since then and the relevance of past experiences is therefore questionable in a context of complex state-building in the wake of intervention. This also has practical consequences as we seek to rectify the often misapplied approaches of today.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As the experience of the drawn-out campaigns in Afghanistan and Iraq have showed, 'winning hearts and minds' was clearly easier said than done (Egnell 2010).”
From Russia and ‘hybrid warfare’ (2016) · cites this paper as Egnell 2010
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 87
Metadata
- Authors
- Egnell, R.
- Affiliations
- Swedish Defence University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Egnell, Robert
- Venue
- Civil Wars
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-09
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 282-303
- ISSN
- 1369-8249 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-968X
- OpenAlex
- W1982166880
- Cited by
- 87
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 24.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Civil Wars (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Military History and Strategy
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Peacebuilding and International Security
- Keywords
- counterinsurgency, hearts and minds, Afghanistan, modernization theory, legitimacy, local population, Malayan Emergency, state building, Western intervention, lessons from history
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Winning ‘Hearts and Minds’? A Critical Analysis of Counter-Insurgency Operations in Afghanistan. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13698249.2010.509562
- The paper
- Egnell, R. (2010). Winning ‘Hearts and Minds’? A Critical Analysis of Counter-Insurgency Operations in Afghanistan. Civil Wars. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698249.2010.509562
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.