Cited by 93Gender, Health, and Social InequalityFeminist Theory and Gender StudiesRisk Perception and Management

The mutual constitution of risk and inequalities: intersectional risk theory

Open access
Olofsson, Anna, Zinn, Jens O., Griffin, Gabriele, Nygren, Katarina Giritli, Cebulla, Andreas, Hannah-Moffat, Kelly·2014·Health, Risk & Society

Abstract

In this article, we examine the conceptual importance of integrating risk and intersectionality theory for the study of how risk and various forms of inequality intersect and are mutually constitutive. We argue that an intersectional perspective can advance risk research by incorporating more effectively the role of such social categories as gender and race into the analysis of ‘risk’ as an empirical phenomenon. In doing so, the intersectional perspective articulates more clearly the connection between the social construction of risk and, on the one hand, the reproduction of new and complex social inequalities and, on the other, intersections of social class, gender, ethnicity and other social categorisations. We trace the intellectual division between risk and feminist-inspired intersectionality research, showing how these approaches can be aligned to study, for example, risk-based welfare and social policy. We use a discussion of general directions within welfare policy to illustrate how an intersectional perspective can be used to show the ways in which new governance strategies create new divisions and reproduce existing forms of social inequality. We conclude the article with a call for a new research agenda to integrate intersectional frameworks with risk theory in order to provide a more nuanced analysis of the relationship between social inequality and risk.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13698575.2014.942258

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Describing socioeconomic problems in terms of 'risk' is a recent neoliberal strategy for simplifying and managing complex social problems.

    “It should be also noted that describing socioeconomic problems in terms of 'risk' is a recent neoliberal strategy for simplifying and managing complex social problems (Olofsson et al., 2014).”

    From Colonization, Normalization and Risk-Assessment: The Case of Youth Criminal Justice Act and Correctional Overrepresentation of Indigenous Youth in Canada (2025) · cites this paper as Olofsson et al., 2014

    The available Abstract [en] links risk-based welfare and social policy to governance strategies that can reproduce social inequality. It does not describe framing socioeconomic problems as risk as a recent neoliberal strategy, or say that the purpose is to simplify and manage complex problems. No page number is provided for the abstract in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Olofsson, A., Zinn, J. O., Griffin, G., Nygren, K. G., Cebulla, A., & Hannah-Moffat, K.
Affiliations
  • Mid Sweden University (SE)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • University of York (GB)
  • Flinders University (AU)
Corresponding author
Olofsson, Anna
Venue
Health, Risk & Society
Published
2014-07-04
Volume
16
Issue
5
Pages
417-430
ISSN
  • 1369-8575 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8331
OpenAlex
W2114656758
Cited by
93
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3
FWCI
19.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Health Risk & Society (publishedVersion)
  • Diva portal (Dalarna University Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminist Theory and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
Keywords
intersectionality, risk theory, social inequality, social construction of risk, gender, race, social class, social policy, governance strategies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review