The mutual constitution of risk and inequalities: intersectional risk theory
Open accessAbstract
In this article, we examine the conceptual importance of integrating risk and intersectionality theory for the study of how risk and various forms of inequality intersect and are mutually constitutive. We argue that an intersectional perspective can advance risk research by incorporating more effectively the role of such social categories as gender and race into the analysis of ‘risk’ as an empirical phenomenon. In doing so, the intersectional perspective articulates more clearly the connection between the social construction of risk and, on the one hand, the reproduction of new and complex social inequalities and, on the other, intersections of social class, gender, ethnicity and other social categorisations. We trace the intellectual division between risk and feminist-inspired intersectionality research, showing how these approaches can be aligned to study, for example, risk-based welfare and social policy. We use a discussion of general directions within welfare policy to illustrate how an intersectional perspective can be used to show the ways in which new governance strategies create new divisions and reproduce existing forms of social inequality. We conclude the article with a call for a new research agenda to integrate intersectional frameworks with risk theory in order to provide a more nuanced analysis of the relationship between social inequality and risk.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Describing socioeconomic problems in terms of 'risk' is a recent neoliberal strategy for simplifying and managing complex social problems.
“It should be also noted that describing socioeconomic problems in terms of 'risk' is a recent neoliberal strategy for simplifying and managing complex social problems (Olofsson et al., 2014).”
From Colonization, Normalization and Risk-Assessment: The Case of Youth Criminal Justice Act and Correctional Overrepresentation of Indigenous Youth in Canada (2025) · cites this paper as Olofsson et al., 2014
The available Abstract [en] links risk-based welfare and social policy to governance strategies that can reproduce social inequality. It does not describe framing socioeconomic problems as risk as a recent neoliberal strategy, or say that the purpose is to simplify and manage complex problems. No page number is provided for the abstract in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Crenshaw, K. (2018) · Feminist Legal Theory · doi:10.4324/9780429500480-5 · Cited by 9,510 · see citing works
The Complexity of Intersectionality
McCall, L. (2005) · Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society · doi:10.1086/426800 · Cited by 6,682 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Beck’s claim that inequalities would be individualised, and as such would increase, found some support in the critique of feminist and gender research, which had revealed that homogenisations of socio-structural categories, such as gender, class, sexuality and ethnicity (for example, Butler, 1990; Knapp, 2005) ignored…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialActive Labour Market Policy Evaluations: A Meta‐Analysis
Card, D., Kluve, J., & Weber, A. (2010) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2010.02387.x · Cited by 1,298 · see citing works
The age of responsibilization: on market-embedded morality
Shamir, R. (2008) · Economy and Society · doi:10.1080/03085140701760833 · Cited by 1,025 · see citing works
Strand, S. (2014) · Research Papers in Education · doi:10.1080/02671522.2013.767370 · Cited by 252 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…to additive models of analysis, shed a more subtle light on the intersections of gender and race (Reingold & Smith, 2012); gender and social class (Mandel, 2012) and ethnicity, gender and social class (Penner & Saperstein, 2013; Strand, 2014) in their relation to welfare policy design and outcome.”
Method
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Barmaki, R. (2025) · International Criminology · doi:10.1007/s43576-025-00170-8 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Olofsson, A., Zinn, J. O., Griffin, G., Nygren, K. G., Cebulla, A., & Hannah-Moffat, K.
- Affiliations
- Mid Sweden University (SE)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- University of York (GB)
- Flinders University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Olofsson, Anna
- Venue
- Health, Risk & Society
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-07-04
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 417-430
- ISSN
- 1369-8575 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8331
- OpenAlex
- W2114656758
- Cited by
- 93
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 19.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- urn.kb.se
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Health Risk & Society (publishedVersion)
- Diva portal (Dalarna University Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminist Theory and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
- Keywords
- intersectionality, risk theory, social inequality, social construction of risk, gender, race, social class, social policy, governance strategies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review