The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Predictive Validity of Global Deficit Scores in Detecting Neuropsychological Impairment in HIV Infection
Abstract
The current study explored the predictive validity of the Global Deficit Score (GDS) approach in summarizing neuropsychological (NP) test results, and specifically in detecting HIV-associated cognitive impairment. A comprehensive NP test battery was administered to 88 HIV+ subjects and 61 healthy HIV- controls comparable for age, education, and ethnicity. Demographically corrected test data were converted to a GDS, which simulates clinicians' ratings by quantifying the number and degree of impaired performances throughout the test battery while attaching relatively less significance to superior performances and/or those within normal limits. Our results indicated that the GDS approach effectively discriminated HIV+ and normal control groups, and accurately classified HIV+ individuals with NP impairment based on the "gold standard" clinical rating approach. Consistent with previous studies using different subject samples and different NP test batteries, the GDS cutpoint of >or=0.50 yielded optimal balance between sensitivity and specificity in classifying NP impairment, thus supporting the generalizability of the method. Moreover, the ability of the GDS to predict NP impairment across several cutpoints was quite strong, with positive predictive power values ranging from 0.71 to 1.00. These findings support the validity of the GDS as a clinically useful way of summarizing results on NP testing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Vardy, J., Wefel, J. S., Ahles, T., Tannock, I. F., & Schagen, S. B. (2008) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdm500 · Cited by 331
A randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover trial of cannabis cigarettes in neuropathic pain
Wilsey, B., Marcotte, T., Tsodikov, A., Millman, J., Bentley, H., Gouaux, B., & Fishman, S. (2008) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2007.12.010 · Cited by 327
Vardy, J. L., Dhillon, H. M., Pond, G. R., Rourke, S. B., Bekele, T., Renton, C., Dodd, A., Zhang, H., Beale, P., Clarke, S., et al. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2015.63.0905 · Cited by 271
Cohen, R. A., Seider, T. R., & Navia, B. (2015) · Alzheimer's Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13195-015-0123-4 · Cited by 149
Minocycline treatment for HIV-associated cognitive impairment: Results from a randomized trial
Sacktor, N., Miyahara, S., Deng, L., Evans, S., Schifitto, G., Cohen, B. A., Paul, R., Robertson, K., Jarocki, B., Scarsi, K., et al. (2011) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e31822f0412 · Cited by 87
Metadata
- Authors
- Carey, C. L., Woods, S. P., Gonzalez, R., Conover, E., Marcotte, T. D., Grant, I., & Heaton, R. K.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-05
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 307-319
- ISSN
- 0165-0475 (ISSN-L)
- 1380-3395
- 1744-411X
- OpenAlex
- W2049689895
- Cited by
- 544
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predictive Validity of Global Deficit Scores in Detecting Neuropsychological Impairment in HIV Infection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13803390490510031
- The paper
- Carey, C. L., Woods, S. P., Gonzalez, R., Conover, E., Marcotte, T. D., Grant, I., & Heaton, R. K. (2004). Predictive Validity of Global Deficit Scores in Detecting Neuropsychological Impairment in HIV Infection. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803390490510031
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.