The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Developmental Normative Data for the Corsi Block-Tapping Task
Abstract
The Corsi Block-Tapping task has been utilized as a measure of spatial memory in both clinical and research contexts for several decades. Despite its wide application, the task has been employed with extraordinary variability in administration and scoring and in the composition of stimulus item sets. We have generated a set of test items containing quasi-randomly derived block-tapping sequences. In another study, we investigated item difficulty as a function of path configuration and showed a decline in performance with increasing span capacity load. In the current cross-sectional study, we evaluated developmental differences in span capacity by measuring performances of school children from grade 1 (M age = 7 years) to grade 8 (M age = 14) and a young adult sample (M age = 21 years). Mean span capacity increased incrementally and linearly with age, and no gender difference was observed. The increase in performance with advancing age supports the notion that spatial immediate memory capacity increases with maturation throughout childhood. Comparisons indicated that the span capacity of eighth graders (M = 6.9) was not statistically different from that of the young adults (M = 7.1), suggesting an upper developmental plateau for spatial span in early adolescence. This study provides a normative database for this widely utilized measure of spatial memory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60452-1 · Cited by 9,860
Cited by
Sex differences in visual-spatial working memory: A meta-analysis
Voyer, D., Voyer, S. D., & Saint-Aubin, J. (2017) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1085-7 · Cited by 400
The Backward Span of the Corsi Block-Tapping Task and Its Association With the WAIS-III Digit Span
Kessels, R. P. C., van den Berg, E., Ruis, C., & Brands, A. M. A. (2008) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191108315611 · Cited by 331
Computer-assisted intervention for children with low numeracy skills
Räsänen, P., Salminen, J., Wilson, A. J., Aunio, P., & Dehaene, S. (2009) · Cognitive Development · doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2009.09.003 · Cited by 314
Effects of physical activity on executive function and motor performance in children with ADHD
Ziereis, S., & Jansen, P. (2015) · Research in Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2014.12.005 · Cited by 193
A framework for executive function in the late elementary years.
Cirino, P. T., Ahmed, Y., Miciak, J., Taylor, W. P., Gerst, E. H., & Barnes, M. A. (2018) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/neu0000427 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Farrell Pagulayan, K., Busch, R. M., Medina, K. L., Bartok, J. A., & Krikorian, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-09
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1043-1052
- ISSN
- 0165-0475 (ISSN-L)
- 1380-3395
- 1744-411X
- OpenAlex
- W2007672358
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Developmental Normative Data for the Corsi Block-Tapping Task. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13803390500350977
- The paper
- Farrell Pagulayan, K., Busch, R. M., Medina, K. L., Bartok, J. A., & Krikorian, R. (2006). Developmental Normative Data for the Corsi Block-Tapping Task. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803390500350977
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.