Cited by 45Cognitive Abilities and TestingMemory Processes and InfluencesCognitive Functions and Memory

The Flynn effect and memory function

Baxendale, Sallie·2010·Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology

Abstract

The Flynn effect refers to the steady increase in IQ that appears to date back at least to the inception of modern-day IQ tests. This study examined the possible Flynn effects on clinical memory tests involving the learning and recall of verbal and nonverbal material. Comparisons of the age-related norms on the list learning and design learning tasks from the Adult Memory and Information Processing Battery (AMIPB), published in 1985, and its successor, the BIRT (Brain Injury Rehabilitation Trust) Memory and Information Processing Battery (BMIPB) published in 2007, indicate that there is a significant Flynn effect on tests of memory function. This effect appears to be material specific with statistically significant improvements in all scores on tests involving the learning and recall of visual material in every age range evident over a 22-year period. Verbal memory abilities appear to be relatively stable with no significant differences between the scores in the majority of age ranges. The ramifications for the clinical interpretation of these tests are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13803390903493515

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several recent studies indicate that the Flynn effect is not limited to intelligence tests but may be measured in tests of memory and object naming, as well as certain commonly used neuropsychological tests.

    “Several recent studies indicate that the Flynn effect is not limited to intelligence tests but may be measured in tests of memory (Baxendale, 2010; Rönnlund & Nilsson, 2008, 2009) and object naming (Connor, Spiro, Obler, & Martin, 2004), as well as certain commonly used neuropsychological tests (Dickinson & Hiscock, 2011).”

    From The Flynn effect: A meta-analysis. (2014) · cites this paper as Baxendale, 2010

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baxendale, S.
Affiliations
National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (GB)
Corresponding author
Baxendale, Sallie
Venue
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
Published
2010-01-29
Volume
32
Issue
7
Pages
699-703
ISSN
  • 0165-0475 (ISSN-L)
  • 1380-3395
  • 1744-411X
OpenAlex
W1966427980
Cited by
45
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
Flynn effect, IQ trends, memory function, verbal memory, visual memory, list learning, design learning
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Female, Humans, Intelligence, Intelligence Tests, Learning, Male, Memory, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Mental Recall, Sweden, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review