The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Directions of research in cross-cultural neuropsychology
Abstract
Comparable cognitive disturbances associated with brain pathology have similar manifestations across members of the human species. However, cognitive abilities measured by neuropsychological tests represent, at least in their contents, culturally learned abilities. Performance is under the influence of a vast array of moderating variables, including: culture, ecological demands, primary language, and educational level. Test scores are associated therefore, not only with the subject's learning opportunities, but also with those variables which a culture dictates are worthy of cognitive amplification. Different cultural environmental contexts will result in the development of different patterns of abilities. The evaluation of an alien cultural group using our current neuropsychological instruments, procedures and norms, results in conceptual errors in assessment. Cross-cultural neuropsychology is in need of addressing several key focal points of neglected research: (1) the normalization of current basic neuropsychological instruments, in different cultural contexts, (2) the development of new neuropsychological instruments, appropriate for different cultural contexts, (3) the analysis of educational factors and subcultural variations in relation to test performance, (4) the analysis of cognitive disturbances in cases of brain pathology in different cultural and educational contexts, (5) the search for commonality in neuropsychological performance among existing human groups, and (6) the analysis of the origins of cognitive activity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The impact of culture and education on non-verbal neuropsychological measurements: A critical review
Rosselli, M., & Ardila, A. (2003) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0278-2626(03)00170-2 · Cited by 473
Self-citationKOSMIDIS, M. H., VLAHOU, C. H., PANAGIOTAKI, P., & KIOSSEOGLOU, G. (2004) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617704102014 · Cited by 398
Lopera, F. (1997) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1997.03540340027028 · Cited by 351
VAN DER ELST, W., VAN BOXTEL, M. P. J., VAN BREUKELEN, G. J. P., & JOLLES, J. (2006) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617706060115 · Cited by 334
Literacy and Memory Decline Among Ethnically Diverse Elders
Manly, J. J., Touradji, P., Tang, M.-X., & Stern, Y. (2003) · Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1076/jcen.25.5.680.14579 · Cited by 329
Metadata
- Authors
- Ardila, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1995-02
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 143-150
- ISSN
- 0165-0475 (ISSN-L)
- 1380-3395
- 1744-411X
- OpenAlex
- W2035776941
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Directions of research in cross-cultural neuropsychology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13803399508406589
- The paper
- Ardila, A. (1995). Directions of research in cross-cultural neuropsychology. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803399508406589
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.