Cited by 45Online and Blended LearningInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsEducational Technology and E-Learning

Challenges for collaborative blended learning in undergraduate students

Monteiro, Elisa, Morrison, Keith·2014·Educational Research and Evaluation

Abstract

This study reports a quasi-experiment in collaborative blended learning (CBL) with undergraduate students who, despite being in a world-leading, enriched digital environment, were new to collaboration and CBL. The mixed-methods research found that only small improvements to students’ CBL took place over time, and explanations for this are proffered. The study found that the students needed specific and intensive instruction, practice, and development in how to collaborate, both with and without blended learning. Students discovered and appreciated the benefits, pitfalls, and challenges to collaboration and CBL largely by doing it: learning from experience. Collaboration and CBL do not release teachers from their instructional and pedagogical roles; rather, they place teachers and face-to-face instruction and practice in collaboration and CBL in classrooms, at the heart of effective practice and improvements here. Implications for teaching are suggested.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13803611.2014.997126

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Monteiro, E., & Morrison, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Saint Joseph (CN)
  • Macau University of Science and Technology (MO)
Corresponding author
Morrison, Keith
Venue
Educational Research and Evaluation
Published
2014-11-17
Volume
20
Issue
7-8
Pages
564-591
ISSN
  • 1380-3611 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-4187
OpenAlex
W2028869549
Cited by
45
References
3
Citations by year
2024: 11 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
8.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Educational Research and Evaluation (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and E-Learning
Keywords
undergraduate students, collaboration skills, blended learning, teacher role, face-to-face teaching, digital learning environments, experiential learning, instructional practices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review