Cited by 62Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesHomicide, Infanticide, and Child AbuseGrief, Bereavement, and Mental Health

Suicide in relation to the experience of stressful life events: a population-based study

Fjeldsted, Rita, Teasdale, Thomas William, Jensen, Martin, Erlangsen, Annette·2017·Archives of Suicide Research

Abstract

Stressful life events have been associated with high risk of suicidal behavior. The aim of this study was to examine whether persons who died by suicide in Denmark had more frequently been exposed to stressful life events, specifically divorce, death of a close relative, exposure to violence, and imprisonment, when compared to gender and age-matched controls. Data from Danish national registers were obtained for the period of 2000-2010 and a nested case-control design was applied. The association between exposure to stressful life events and suicide was examined using logistic regression analysis. In all, 7,115 suicides were identified during the 11 years of follow-up. For each of these, 20 age- and gender-matched controls were randomly selected (n = 142,300). Cases who died by suicide had an odds ratio of 9.3 (CI-95%: 7.8-11.0) of having been exposed to imprisonment five or more times when compared to controls. People who died by suicide had 1.5-fold (CI-95%: 1.3-1.6) higher risk of having experienced a divorce. Stressful life events, such as divorce and imprisonment, were more frequent in temporal proximity to the date of death among the suicide cases than for end of exposure for controls (p < .001 and p < .001, respectively). Our findings confirm that, using nationwide data, stressful life events are positively associated to subsequent suicide. Causal pathways linking the two may, however, be indirect.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13811118.2016.1259596

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 47 · Cited by 62

Authors
Fjeldsted, R., Teasdale, T. W., Jensen, M., & Erlangsen, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Danish Research Institute for Suicide Prevention (DK)
Corresponding author
Fjeldsted, Rita
Venue
Archives of Suicide Research
Published
2016-11-16
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
544-555
ISSN
  • 1381-1118 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-6136
OpenAlex
W2555840315
Cited by
62
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 1
FWCI
10.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Suicide Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Keywords
suicide, life events, divorce, incarceration, violence exposure, suicide risk factors, Denmark
MeSH terms
Exposure to Violence, Bereavement, Denmark, Divorce, Female, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Middle Aged, Prisoners, Prisons, Stress, Psychological, Suicide, Time Factors, Multivariate Analysis, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio, Case-Control Studies, Information Storage and Retrieval

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review