Mayo's Older African Americans Normative Studies: Norms for Boston Naming Test, Controlled Oral Word Association, Category Fluency, Animal Naming, Token Test, Wrat-3 Reading, Trail Making Test, Stroop Test, and Judgment of Line Orientation
Abstract
Normative data for older African Americans are presented for several clinical neuropsychological measures, including Boston Naming Test, Controlled Oral Word Association, Category Fluency, Token Test, WRAT-3 Reading, Trail Making Test, Stroop Color and Word Test, and Judgment of Line Orientation. Age-adjusted norms were derived from a sample of 309 cognitively normal, community-dwelling individuals, aged 56 through 94, participating in Mayo's Older African Americans Normative Studies (MOAANS). Years of education were modelled on age-scaled scores to derive regression Equations that may be applied for further demographic correction. These data should enhance interpretation of individual test performances and facilitate analysis of neuropsychological profile patterns in older African American patients who present for dementia evaluations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cognitive tests have been validated in Black and White participants and are consistent with the Vascular Cognitive Impairment Harmonization Standards.
“cognitive tests have been validated in Black and White participants20,21 and are consistent with the Vascular Cognitive Impairment Harmonization Standards.22”
From Sex differences in cognitive decline among US adults (2021) · cites this paper as [21]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 52 · Cited by 197
- Authors
- Lucas, J. A., Ivnik, R. J., Smith, G. E., Ferman, T. J., Willis, F. B., Petersen, R. C., & Graff-Radford, N. R.
- Affiliations
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lucas, John A.
- Venue
- The Clinical Neuropsychologist
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-05
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 243-269
- ISSN
- 0920-1637 (ISSN-L)
- 1385-4046
- 1744-4144
- OpenAlex
- W2020536810
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 3.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Clinical Neuropsychologist (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (P50‐AG16574, P50AG016574)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- African American older adults, reference values, Boston Naming Test, semantic fluency, Token Test, Trail Making Test, Stroop task, years of schooling, demographic correction, dementia assessment, cognitive aging
- MeSH terms
- Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Animals, Association Learning, Black or African American, Demography, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Judgment, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Orientation, Reaction Time, Reading, Mental Recall, Verbal Learning, Word Association Tests, Geriatric Assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review