Cited by 197Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchHistorical and Modern Theater StudiesPsychological Testing and Assessment

Mayo's Older African Americans Normative Studies: Norms for Boston Naming Test, Controlled Oral Word Association, Category Fluency, Animal Naming, Token Test, Wrat-3 Reading, Trail Making Test, Stroop Test, and Judgment of Line Orientation

Lucas, John A., Ivnik, Robert J., Smith, Glenn E., Ferman, Tanis J., Willis, Floyd B., Petersen, Ronald C., Graff-Radford, Neill R.·2005·The Clinical Neuropsychologist

Abstract

Normative data for older African Americans are presented for several clinical neuropsychological measures, including Boston Naming Test, Controlled Oral Word Association, Category Fluency, Token Test, WRAT-3 Reading, Trail Making Test, Stroop Color and Word Test, and Judgment of Line Orientation. Age-adjusted norms were derived from a sample of 309 cognitively normal, community-dwelling individuals, aged 56 through 94, participating in Mayo's Older African Americans Normative Studies (MOAANS). Years of education were modelled on age-scaled scores to derive regression Equations that may be applied for further demographic correction. These data should enhance interpretation of individual test performances and facilitate analysis of neuropsychological profile patterns in older African American patients who present for dementia evaluations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13854040590945337

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cognitive tests have been validated in Black and White participants and are consistent with the Vascular Cognitive Impairment Harmonization Standards.

    “cognitive tests have been validated in Black and White participants20,21 and are consistent with the Vascular Cognitive Impairment Harmonization Standards.22”

    From Sex differences in cognitive decline among US adults (2021) · cites this paper as [21]

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 52 · Cited by 197

Authors
Lucas, J. A., Ivnik, R. J., Smith, G. E., Ferman, T. J., Willis, F. B., Petersen, R. C., & Graff-Radford, N. R.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Lucas, John A.
Venue
The Clinical Neuropsychologist
Published
2005-05
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
243-269
ISSN
  • 0920-1637 (ISSN-L)
  • 1385-4046
  • 1744-4144
OpenAlex
W2020536810
Cited by
197
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 11
FWCI
3.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Clinical Neuropsychologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (P50‐AG16574, P50AG016574)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
African American older adults, reference values, Boston Naming Test, semantic fluency, Token Test, Trail Making Test, Stroop task, years of schooling, demographic correction, dementia assessment, cognitive aging
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Animals, Association Learning, Black or African American, Demography, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Judgment, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Orientation, Reaction Time, Reading, Mental Recall, Verbal Learning, Word Association Tests, Geriatric Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review