The American Board of Clinical Neuropsychology (ABCN) and American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN): Recent milestones and future goals 2014–2023
Abstract
Objective: The American Board of Clinical Neuropsychology (ABCN) and the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN) have become leading organizations in the credentialing of clinical neuropsychologists and promotion of the field, respectively. This paper updates the literature by summarizing the activities and growth of ABCN and AACN during the period 2014 through 2023. Method: Prior papers have reviewed the history of these organizations up to 2014. In this paper, the authors describe milestones that each organization has reached, provide an update reflecting improved functions and new initiatives, and describe how the organizations have responded to numerous challenges. Conclusions: The past decade has witnessed substantial societal and technological evolution, as well as wrenching events including a global pandemic and public outcry over continued racial injustice. ABCN and AACN have evolved in the face of these changes, positioning each organization well to take on future challenges.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Age-corrected standardized scores were used in accordance with guidance from the American Board of Clinical Neuropsychology and American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology, which supports eliminating race as a demographic adjustment in neuropsychological assessments.
“For this study, we used age-corrected standardized scores in accordance with guidance from the American Board of Clinical Neuropsychology and American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology, which supports eliminating race as a demographic adjustment in neuropsychological assessments (Bodin et al., 2023).”
From Evaluating cognitive performance using the National Institutes of Health Toolbox Cognitive Battery in children with traumatic brain injury (2025) · cites this paper as Bodin et al., 2023
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Petersen, B., Vo, N.-T. N., Anton, N., Yeates, K. O., & Treble-Barna, A. (2025) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s135561772510146x · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bodin, D., Beebe, D. W., Fuchs, K., Lucas, J., & Marcopulos, B.
- Affiliations
- Nationwide Children's Hospital (US)
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
- University of Virginia (US)
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- James Madison University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bodin, Doug
- Venue
- The Clinical Neuropsychologist
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2023-03-17
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 784-811
- ISSN
- 0920-1637 (ISSN-L)
- 1385-4046
- 1744-4144
- OpenAlex
- W4327694604
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 1.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Clinical Neuropsychologist (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Occupational and Professional Licensing Regulation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurology and Historical Studies
- Keywords
- professional society development, racial injustice
- MeSH terms
- Academies and Institutes, Goals, Humans, Neuropsychological Tests, Neuropsychology, United States
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review