Cited by 6Occupational and Professional Licensing RegulationPsychology Research and BibliometricsNeurology and Historical Studies

The American Board of Clinical Neuropsychology (ABCN) and American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN): Recent milestones and future goals 2014–2023

Bodin, Doug, Beebe, Dean W., Fuchs, Kathleen, Lucas, John, Marcopulos, Bernice·2023·The Clinical Neuropsychologist

Abstract

Objective: The American Board of Clinical Neuropsychology (ABCN) and the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN) have become leading organizations in the credentialing of clinical neuropsychologists and promotion of the field, respectively. This paper updates the literature by summarizing the activities and growth of ABCN and AACN during the period 2014 through 2023. Method: Prior papers have reviewed the history of these organizations up to 2014. In this paper, the authors describe milestones that each organization has reached, provide an update reflecting improved functions and new initiatives, and describe how the organizations have responded to numerous challenges. Conclusions: The past decade has witnessed substantial societal and technological evolution, as well as wrenching events including a global pandemic and public outcry over continued racial injustice. ABCN and AACN have evolved in the face of these changes, positioning each organization well to take on future challenges.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13854046.2023.2190538

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Age-corrected standardized scores were used in accordance with guidance from the American Board of Clinical Neuropsychology and American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology, which supports eliminating race as a demographic adjustment in neuropsychological assessments.

    “For this study, we used age-corrected standardized scores in accordance with guidance from the American Board of Clinical Neuropsychology and American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology, which supports eliminating race as a demographic adjustment in neuropsychological assessments (Bodin et al., 2023).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bodin, D., Beebe, D. W., Fuchs, K., Lucas, J., & Marcopulos, B.
Affiliations
  • Nationwide Children's Hospital (US)
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • James Madison University (US)
Corresponding author
Bodin, Doug
Venue
The Clinical Neuropsychologist
Published
2023-03-17
Volume
37
Issue
4
Pages
784-811
ISSN
  • 0920-1637 (ISSN-L)
  • 1385-4046
  • 1744-4144
OpenAlex
W4327694604
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2
FWCI
1.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Clinical Neuropsychologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Occupational and Professional Licensing Regulation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurology and Historical Studies
Keywords
professional society development, racial injustice
MeSH terms
Academies and Institutes, Goals, Humans, Neuropsychological Tests, Neuropsychology, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review