The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Meta-Analysis of the Neuropsychological Effects of Adjuvant Chemotherapy Treatment in Women Treated for Breast Cancer
Abstract
Given the improvement in mortality rates associated with breast cancer, the importance of understanding the long-term neuropsychological consequences of chemotherapy is becoming increasingly vital. This study applies meta-analytic techniques to the scant literature on the relationship between contemporary adjuvant chemotherapy treatment for breast cancer and cognitive dysfunction as examined through neuropsychological indices. Seven studies (involving more than 300 participants) were selected from over 200 potential articles, based on three inclusion criteria: presence of breast cancer, administration of chemotherapy treatment, and use of neuropsychological tests. From these, nine treatment-control comparisons were used to generate 129 Hedge's d effect sizes across the cognitive domains of simple attention, working memory short- and long-term memory, speed of processing, language, spatial abilities, and motor function. Small to medium cumulative effect sizes, showing diminished cognitive function for chemotherapy treatment groups compared to control groups, were obtained for each of the eight cognitive domains. Overall, these results suggest that women who undergo adjuvant chemotherapy as treatment for breast cancer may experience subtle yet consequential cognitive decline.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research
Rosenthal, R. (1991) · doi:10.4135/9781412984997 · Cited by 4,635
A Fail-Safe N for Effect Size in Meta-Analysis
Orwin, R. G. (1983) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164923 · Cited by 2,064 · cited 1×
“Using Orwin’s (1983) formula (see Lipsey & Wilson, 2001), our fail-safe number Table 2 Weighted pooled effect sizes and tests of heterogeneity for each cognitive domain”
MethodMeta-Analysis: Recent Developments in Quantitative Methods for Literature Reviews
Rosenthal, R., & DiMatteo, M. R. (2001) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.59 · Cited by 1,780
Cited by
A developmental-contextual model of couples coping with chronic illness across the adult life span.
Berg, C. A., & Upchurch, R. (2007) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.6.920 · Cited by 877
Holland, J. C., Andersen, B., Breitbart, W. S., Buchmann, L. O., Compas, B., Deshields, T. L., Dudley, M. M., Fleishman, S., Fulcher, C. D., Greenberg, D. B., et al. (2013) · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network · doi:10.6004/jnccn.2013.0027 · Cited by 423
Vardy, J., Wefel, J. S., Ahles, T., Tannock, I. F., & Schagen, S. B. (2008) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdm500 · Cited by 331
Factors affecting cancer survivors' employment and work ability
Taskila, T., & Lindbohm, M. L. (2007) · Acta Oncologica · doi:10.1080/02841860701355048 · Cited by 313
The Residual Medium and Long-term Cognitive Effects of Benzodiazepine Use: An Updated Meta-analysis
Crowe, S. F., & Stranks, E. K. (2018) · Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology · doi:10.1093/arclin/acx120 · Cited by 209
Metadata
- Authors
- Stewart, A., Bielajew, C., Collins, B., Parkinson, M., & Tomiak, E.
- Venue
- The Clinical Neuropsychologist
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-02
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 76-89
- ISSN
- 0920-1637 (ISSN-L)
- 1385-4046
- 1744-4144
- OpenAlex
- W2004218476
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 1.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Meta-Analysis of the Neuropsychological Effects of Adjuvant Chemotherapy Treatment in Women Treated for Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/138540491005875
- The paper
- Stewart, A., Bielajew, C., Collins, B., Parkinson, M., & Tomiak, E. (2006). A Meta-Analysis of the Neuropsychological Effects of Adjuvant Chemotherapy Treatment in Women Treated for Breast Cancer. The Clinical Neuropsychologist. https://doi.org/10.1080/138540491005875
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.