The hopkins verbal learning test: Development of a new memory test with six equivalent forms
Abstract
A new test of verbal learning and memory, the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test, was developed. The test consists of three trials of free-recall of a 12-item, semantically categorized list, followed by yes/no recognition. Six parallel forms yielded equivalent results in normals. The performance of patients with Alzheimer's disease and chronic amnesia is described. The test is likely to be useful in patients too impaired for more comprehensive memory assessments and where repeated testing is necessary.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 32 · Cited by 1,317
- Authors
- Brandt, J.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Brandt, Jason
- ORCID
- Brandt, Jason
- Venue
- Clinical Neuropsychologist
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1991-04
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 125-142
- ISSN
- 0920-1637 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1975699010
- Cited by
- 1,317
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 34 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 50 · 2014: 58 · 2013: 55 · 2012: 55
- FWCI
- 5.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Clinical Neuropsychologist (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Keywords
- Hopkins Verbal Learning Test, verbal learning, verbal memory, free recall, recognition memory, parallel test forms, Alzheimer's disease, memory assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
