The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Perspective, Instruction, and Cognitive Style in Spatial Representation of a Virtual Environment
Abstract
An environment can be experienced by moving around in it, inspecting it from above, studying a map, or listening to a verbal description. How does learning from different spatial perspectives together with instructions to focus on particular aspects of an environment, affect one's cognitive map? Fifty-four undergraduates (30 females, 24 males) learned a route through an urban virtual environment from either a map (survey perspective) or from virtual navigation (route perspective), with instructions to focus either on landmarks or on intersections. The survey group learned the environment by watching a dot moving through a map, whereas the route group learned by watching a virtual person walking through the virtual environment. While learning, participants were stopped at critical points and instructions focused their attention on either landmarks or intersections. After learning, all participants performed several spatial tasks: navigation, map drawing, and pointing. Individual differences in the cognitive style of spatial representation were assessed. Results showed that spatial perspective and individual differences in spatial representations interacted to affect performance.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The human evaluation protocol used in this study is in line with classical protocols in human cognition.
“This is in line with classical protocols in human cognition (Allen et al., 1996; Hegarty et al., 2006; Pazzaglia & Taylor, 2007; Weisberg et al., 2014; Meneghetti et al., 2016; 2021).”
From Does Spatial Cognition Emerge in Frontier Models? (2024) · cites this paper as Pazzaglia & Taylor, 2007
Citations
Cites
The Development of Spatial Representations of Large-Scale Environments
Siegel, A. W., & White, S. H. (1975) · Advances in Child Development and Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0065-2407(08)60007-5 · Cited by 1,830
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- 10.1002/acp.1000 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199904)13:2<145::AID-ACP550>3.0.CO;2-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0160-2896(02)00116-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0096-1523.3.4.590 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF01544230 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1021668724970 · DOI
- 10.1080/13875868.2005.9683802 · DOI
- Lynch K., 1960, The image of the city
- 10.1068/p3380 · DOI
- Pazzaglia F., 2000, Giornale Italiano di Psicologia., 27, 133
- Pazzaglia F., 2000, Giornale Italiano di Psicologia., 27, 627
- Pazzaglia F., 1994, Giornale Italiano di Psicologia., 2, 267
- Pazzaglia F., 2001, European Journal of Cognitive Psychology., 13, 493, 10.1080/09541440125778 · DOI
- 10.1068/p5465 · DOI
- 10.1207/s15326969eco0701_1 · DOI
- 10.1037/0278-7393.32.3.516 · DOI
- Siegel A. W., 1975, Advances in child development, 37
- Taylor H. A., 2000, GIScience 2000 Abstracts., 1, 86
- 10.1016/0010-0285(82)90019-6 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00481.x · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Variations in cognitive maps: Understanding individual differences in navigation.
Weisberg, S. M., Schinazi, V. R., Newcombe, N. S., Shipley, T. F., & Epstein, R. A. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0035261 · Cited by 270
A meta-analysis of sex differences in human navigation skills
Nazareth, A., Huang, X., Voyer, D., & Newcombe, N. (2019) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-019-01633-6 · Cited by 201
GPS use negatively affects environmental learning through spatial transformation abilities
Ruginski, I. T., Creem-Regehr, S. H., Stefanucci, J. K., & Cashdan, E. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.05.001 · Cited by 137
Does Spatial Cognition Emerge in Frontier Models?
Ramakrishnan, S. K., Wijmans, E., Kraehenbuehl, P., & Koltun, V. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.06468 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Pazzaglia, F., & Taylor, H. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Padua (IT)
- Tufts University (US)
- Venue
- Spatial Cognition & Computation
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-12-18
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 349-364
- ISSN
- 1387-5868 (ISSN-L)
- 1542-7633
- OpenAlex
- W2090937725
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Spatial Cognition and Computation (publishedVersion)
- Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
- Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Geography Education and Pedagogy
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- cognitive maps, spatial representation, virtual worlds, spatial perspective, cognitive style, individual differences, landmark learning, route learning, map learning, virtual navigation, spatial attention, route navigation, map drawing, pointing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review