The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis
Abstract
Special thanks to the reviewers of JCPA, Volume 10, 2008. As a token of appreciation we welcome you as ICPA-Forum members. Armstrong, Kenneth, Queen Mary University Bache, Ian, University of Sheffi...
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Teegen, H., Doh, J. P., & Vachani, S. (2004) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400112 · Cited by 682
Developing a Conceptual Framework for Comparing Social Value Creation
Kroeger, A., & Weber, C. (2014) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2012.0344 · Cited by 371
Wendt, C. (2009) · Journal of European Social Policy · doi:10.1177/0958928709344247 · Cited by 256
Fraussen, B., Albareda, A., & Braun, C. (2020) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11077-020-09382-3 · Cited by 93
Vrydagh, J. (2022) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11077-022-09450-w · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-12
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 467-468
- ISSN
- 1387-6988 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-5448
- OpenAlex
- W4235507258
- Cited by
- 455
- References
- 0
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13876980802469434
- The paper
- Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis. (2008). Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876980802469434
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
