Why don’t more college athletes engage in activism? A multilevel analysis of barriers to activism in the hegemonic arena of intercollegiate sport
Abstract
Drawing from interviews with 31 collegiate athlete activists, the goal of this study was to identify barriers to athlete activism in the hegemonic arena of U.S. college sport. I utilize a multilevel analysis to map how activism is rendered counter-hegemonic, non-normative behavior in college sport through barriers manifesting at the macro-level (societal), meso-level (organizational), and micro-level (individual). Barriers at the macro-level include social norms prioritizing athlete identity and stigma attached to activism, while barriers at the meso-level include the strict regulation of athletes’ lives, isolation on campus, team cultural norms, and institutional power relations. Finally, emotional exhaustion and lack of rapport with peers manifested at the micro-level, further constituting barriers to activist efforts. The complex interplay of barriers at multiple levels, I argue, perpetuates a hegemonic order where contemporary collegiate athlete activists and the arena of sport become sites for the struggle for power – that is, cultural sites in which the battle between hegemonic forces and agents of resistance becomes manifested and visible.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Awareness and addressing injustice are not consistently seen within college sport.
“two elements not consistently seen within college sport (Kluch, 2023).”
From “It’s Not Just About Competition – It’s Ceremony”: Introducing the Embedded Indigeneity Framework for Understanding Identity, Mission, and Practice in TCU and NASNTI Athletics (2026) · cites this paper as Kluch, 2023
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Foster, S., & Welch, N. (2026) · Journal of Intercollegiate Sport · doi:10.17161/jis.v19i3.24806
“Culturally responsive practice also exists in the awareness and addressing injustice, two elements not consistently seen within college sport (Kluch, 2023).”
- Authors
- Kluch, Y.
- Affiliations
- Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kluch, Yannick
- ORCID
- Kluch, Yannick
- Venue
- Sport Management Review
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2023-03-07
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 677-697
- ISSN
- 1441-3523 (ISSN-L)
- 1839-2083
- OpenAlex
- W4323359443
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 9.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Sport Management Review (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Physical Education and Sports Studies
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sports, Gender, and Society
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Movements and Cultural Identity
- Keywords
- athlete activism, college athletes, barriers to activism, hegemony, social norms, athletic identity, stigma, institutional power relations, team culture, emotional exhaustion, college athletics, power relations in sport
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review