Cited by 30Information Systems Theories and ImplementationManagement and Organizational StudiesArtificial Intelligence Applications

Revising the “science of the organisation”: Theorising AI agency and actorhood

van Rijmenam, Mark, Logue, Danielle·2021·Innovation

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is a central technology underpinning the fourth industrial revolution, driving dramatic changes in contemporary cyber-physical systems and challenging existing ways of theorising organisations and management. AI agency and the rise of the artificially intelligent agent are both fundamentally different and yet increasingly similar to human agency in terms of intentionality and reflexivity. As ‘Child AI’ emerges—AI that is created by other AI—the early human design and interaction becomes increasingly distant and removed. These developments, while seemingly futuristic, change the human-technology interface through which we organise. In this essay, we explore understandings of AI agency, capability, and governance, and present implications for organisatonal theorising in sociomateriality, actor-network theory, institutional theory and the behavioral theory of the firm. We contribute to a growing and reflexive research agenda that can accommodate and regenerate theorising around this significant technological advancement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14479338.2020.1816833

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These attributes of AI algorithms mean they have the potential to impact work design in new, and often more extreme, ways.

    “As we elaborate in this review, these attributes of AI algorithms mean they have the potential to impact work design in new, and often more extreme, ways (van Rijmenam & Logue, 2021).”

    From Algorithms as work designers: How algorithmic management influences the design of jobs (2022) · cites this paper as van Rijmenam & Logue, 2021

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Rijmenam, M., & Logue, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Technology Sydney
  • University of Technology Sydney (AU)
Venue
Innovation
Published
2020-09-11
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
127-144
ISSN
  • 1447-9338 (ISSN-L)
  • 2204-0226
OpenAlex
W3086483470
Cited by
30
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2
FWCI
4.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Innovation (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
Keywords
AI agency, artificial intelligence, actorhood, organizational theory, human-technology interface, AI governance, AI capabilities, sociomateriality, actor-network theory, institutional theory, behavioral theory of the firm, reflexivity, intentionality, cyber-physical systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review