Lessons in learning: learning, teaching and motivation at a music summer school
Abstract
This paper reports on research carried out at the Contemporary Music‐making for Amateurs (COMA) Summer School. A range of qualitative research methods were used to investigate participants' reasons for making music, and from these data a number of educational themes emerged: (i) general interactions between tutors and participants; (ii) evaluation of teaching, particularly at ‘crisis’ moments; (iii) motivation and responsibility of participants. These are explored here through diary and questionnaire extracts, revealing the high expectations and levels of motivation shared by the participants, and considering their implications for music teaching in schools and universities. The suggestion is made that considering music learning outside the institutional setting can shed new light on familiar practices, and help to encourage a pragmatic idealism that keeps the student learning experience at the heart of educational thinking.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Teachers' support, relationships and feedback are important in music learning.
“Pitts (2004) studied the importance of teachers' support, relationships and feedback in music learning.”
From Teachers’ perceptions of declining participation in school music (2011) · cites this paper as Pitts (2004)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Teachers’ perceptions of declining participation in school music
Ng, C.-H. C., & Hartwig, K. (2011) · Research Studies in Music Education · doi:10.1177/1321103x11423598 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
- Authors
- Pitts> *, S. E.
- Venue
- Music Education Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-03
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 81-95
- ISSN
- 1461-3808 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-9893
- OpenAlex
- W2086675341
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 16.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Music Education Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Diverse Music Education Insights
- Social Sciences › Education › Music Education and Analysis
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Art Education and Development
- Keywords
- amateur music, student motivation, music education, learner-tutor interaction, teaching evaluation, student responsibility
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review