Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 5

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Praxis and poiesis in piano repertoire preparation

Dos Santos, Regina Antunes Teixeira, Hentschke, Liane·2011·Music Education Research

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14613808.2011.603042

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Aristotle, 1976, The Nicomachean ethics
  2. Barry N.H., 2002, The science and psychology of music performance, 151, 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195138108.003.0010 · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195138108.003.0010
  3. Bower D., 2004, Visions of research in music education, 4, 37
  4. Bowman W.D., 1998, Philosophal perspectives on music
  5. Bowman W.D., 2005, Praxial music education, 52
  6. Carr W., 1986, Becoming critical. Education knowledge and action research
  7. Davidson J.W, 1998, The social psychology of music, 188
  8. Davies S., 2010, Handbook of emotion. Theory, research, applications, 15
  9. Dos Santos R.A.T., 2010, International Journal of Music Education, 28, 247, 10.1177/0255761410371278 · DOI
  10. Elliott D.J., 1995, Music matters: A new philosophy of music education
  11. Elliott D.J., 2005, Praxial music education
  12. Gabrielsson A., 2002, The psychology of music, 501
  13. 10.1177/03057356030313002 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1017/S0265051700003466 · DOI
  15. Hallam S., 1997, Does practice make perfect?, 89
  16. Heidegger M., 1958, Essais et conférences [Essays and conferences]
  17. Jørgensen H., 2009, The Oxford handbook of music psychology, 265
  18. Krämpe R.Th., 1997, Does practice make perfect?, 165
  19. Manturzewska M., 2006, Musical development from a lifespan perspective, 21
  20. Mesquita A.P., 2004, Aspectos disputados da filosofia aristotélica [ Disputed aspects in aristothelian phylosophy ]
  21. Ozman H.A., 2007, Philosophical foundations of education
  22. Regelski T.A., 1998, Philosophy of Music Education Reviews, 6, 22
  23. 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2005.00095.x · doi:10.1111/j.1469-5812.2005.00095.x
  24. Regelski T.A., 2005, Praxial music education, 219
  25. Rohwer D., 2002, International Journal of Music Education, 40, 15
  26. Ruthsatz J., 2008, Intelligence, 36, 330, 10.1016/j.intell.2007.08.003 · DOI
  27. Silverman M., 2007, International Journal of Music Education, 25, 101, 10.1177/0255761407079950 · doi:10.1177/0255761407079950
  28. Smith J.A., 2003, Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to methods
  29. Stake R.E., 1995, The art of case study research
  30. Stake R.E., 2000, The handbook of qualitative research, 435
  31. 10.1177/0255761406065472 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Dos Santos, R. A. T., & Hentschke, L.
Venue
Music Education Research
Published
2011-09
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
273-292
ISSN
  • 1461-3808
  • 1469-9893
Cited by
5
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.